This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
18/ MARCH/APRIL 2012 THE RIDER Texas A&M Researchers Unlock Quarter Horse Genome


COLLEGE STATION, TX – A truly American horse breed, the American Quarter Horse first came to being in the early colonial era in America. And in a study recently reported in the jour- nal, BMC Genomics, researchers at Texas A&M University’s College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences (CVM), working with collab- orators in the Texas A&M College of Agriculture and Life Sciences and the AgriLife Genomics and Bioinformatics


Genome sequencing is not a new science, but advances in sequencing technology, often referred to as next- generation sequencing, have made it easier and cheaper to sequence the genome of an individual, which can then be analyzed for clues causing genetic disorders and distinctive traits.


Center, have sequenced the first Quar- ter Horse genome – unlocking the secrets of what makes this breed so unique.


The Texas A&M Quarter Horse is the first horse to be sequenced using next- generation sequencing technology. “Genome sequencing aids our study of normal and abnormal genetic variation,” said Dr. Scott Dindot, Assistant Professor in the Department of Veterinary Pathobiology at the CVM. “This project is important because it is a start towards under- standing what genetic factors make breeds unique, and what mutations may play a role in presenting or diagnosing disease.”


The genome sequence of a Quar- ter Horse has a the potential to have a tremendous impact on the equine industry, as the American Quarter Horse Association represents the largest breed registry in the United States. The information from this study may lead to improvements in performance in horses, and facilitate the management of health of horses everywhere.


Dr. Noah Cohen, Professor in the Department of Large Ani- mal Clinical Sciences in the CVM and collaborator in the study, underscored the impor- tance of the role genetic variation plays in the disease process. “This study represents a valuable contribution to our understanding of genetic varia- tion in horses,” said Cohen, “including efforts to study the relationship between genetic variation and susceptibility to important diseases in Quarter Horses and other breeds.” The first horse genome to be sequenced and assembled, a Thoroughbred mare, was com- pleted by a large international consortium. This reference assembly was used to map the


Quarter Horse genome and to identify differences in genetic information between the two horses. The sequence data from the project has been made available publicly for researchers inter- ested in equine genetics.


“The horse used in the study, a mare named Sugar, is the descendant of key foundation sires in the Quarter Horse breed,” added Dindot. “We were able to identify several genetic variants in this mare, both good and bad, known to be common among Quarter Horses. Results from this study have increased our knowledge of genetic variation in horses three- to four-fold, and proved that through collaborations such as this, we can one day apply this state-of-the-art technology to identify and possibly to manage genetic disor- ders not only in horses, but also in other species.”


“Many diseases and ‘syndromes’ are the result of genetic variation,” said Dr. Jason Sawyer, Texas AgriLife Research scientist and Associate Pro- fessor of animal science. “Perhaps more importantly, the ability to combat infectious diseases may be greatly impacted by the underlying genome and the variation that arises during recombination. This study has identi- fied areas of variation that may play a role in the health and disease resistance of horses. While more research must be done to specifically identify desir- able and beneficial variants, this study has set the stage to enable those future studies.”


Funding for the study was provid- ed by the G. Willard and Ginger Pool Equine Teaching and Research Endow- ment, the Link Equine Research Endowment, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M Department of Animal Science, and the Department of Veterinary Pathobiology at the CVM.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92