This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
IMPACTS OF PRIME-AGE ADULT MORTALITY ON ADOLESCENTS’ LABOR SUPPLY 97


effects (for example, diet effects, effects on children, and other income- generating effects).


Our empirical setting is different from that of these two studies in that most of the sample households supply labor in nonagricultural sectors. That is, intrahousehold decisions on labor allocation for self-employment, such as own farming, are not the issue. With a focus on trade-offs between human capital investments and labor supply, I analyze labor force participation deci- sions among adolescents without distinguishing between the agricultural and nonagricultural sectors.


Prime-Age Adult Mortality and Child Schooling


It is widely believed that the death of a parent and prime-age household member has serious repercussions on the well-being and future of children— their schooling in particular. However, the literature on this topic does not necessarily present similar results, partly because of differences in method- ologies across studies.


First, the literature is divided into two groups of studies: those using panel data and those based on cross-sectional data. The studies that used panel data can potentially identify ex ante and ex post effects of prime-age adult mortal- ity on child schooling.


Second, the focus of studies may be parental deaths (leading to orphan- hood) or prime-age adult deaths in general. Since the two are not exclusive, studies could basically analyze both impacts, but this portion of the literature is generally divided into two groups, with relative emphasis on either paren- tal deaths or prime-age deaths. This chapter sheds light on both issues using panel data.


Approaches and findings from the literature are summarized in Table 5.2. Five studies use panel data: Ainsworth, Beegle, and Koda (2005); Yamano and Jayne (2005); Beagle, De Weerdt, and Dercon (2006); Case and Ardington (2006); and Evans and Miguel (2007). All of these studies, except Beegle, De Weerdt, and Dercon (2006), used standard methods of panel analysis with children in similar age ranges. Beegle, De Weerdt, and Dercon (2006) used children aged 0–15 who had not experienced parental deaths in the baseline to track their completed years of schooling and anthropometric measures later in their lives, under the assumption that parental deaths were not pre- dictable and also not correlated with the health and schooling of children in the initial round. In this respect, although they used panel data, it is not straightforward to compare their results with others. As Table 5.2 shows, with the exception of Yamano and Jayne (2005), all studies analyzed the effects of parental deaths. However, Ainsworth, Beegle, and Koda (2005) and Yamano and Jayne (2005) are the only studies that directly


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150