This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
NEWS


he Department for Transport has announced that the next Inter City West Coast franchise will begin on December 9, 2012, and run until 2026.


T


It has confirmed that the state-run Directly Operated Railways (DOR) could step in to run the franchise from April next year, when Vir- gin is due to hand back the fran- chise, unless it agrees “satisfactory terms” with the Government.


DOR already runs East Coast ser- vices, after National Express pulled out of the franchise 18 months ago.


Virgin Rail Group chief executive officer Tony Collins said: “We are pleased to have been invited by the Government to discuss an ex- tension to the current West Coast franchise. This would mean we


ment has now been published, will “align” with the proposed opening of the first phase of HS2, the Gov- ernment said.


The DfT said it would have a more relaxed approach to timetabling when considering bids for the new franchise, while “retaining obliga- tions that protect the key elements of service, such as principal first and last trains and minimum num- bers of station stops per week and per day”.


would continue to run services for passengers for an additional eight months at an exciting and chal- lenging time for the country with the Olympic Games next year.


“We look forward to continuing our discussions with the Depart-


ment for Transport with a view to concluding a commercial agree- ment that will be in the interests of passengers and deliver value for money to taxpayers.”


The new franchise, for which the delayed Invitation to Tender docu-


It said this would mean signifi- cantly less “micro-management”. More flexible franchises was a key demand of the McNulty review.


The shortlist of bidders for the new, extended franchise includes Virgin as well as First, SNCF and Abellio.


R


ailway punctuality hit 92.9% during April – one of the


best results on record, though still down on last year’s 94%.


Using the Moving Annual Average metric, London Overground has become the country’s joint most reliable rail network, with both it and Merseyrail on 94.9%, just ahead of c2c on 94.7%, while East Coast is last on 83.3%.


Network Rail director of operations and customer services, Robin Gisby, said: “A good start to the year sees train performance continue to deliver consistently high levels of punctuality. Our


focus remains as we, and the train operators, endeavour to deliver a high performing and reliable railway for almost four million daily users.”


East Coast had earlier criticised Network’s Rail’s


after a number of disruptions affected its figures.


During one incident in April, technical issues caused the closure of the East Coast Main Line between York and Northallerton for several hours, for example.


But Network Rail argued: “East Coast saw punctuality improve for


performance,


the fourth period in a row and beat last year’s period one result.


“If three big external events were excluded from the statistics East Coast would have reported train performance of almost 90%, as the underlying reliability of the infrastructure and the train fleet continues to improve.”


For our interview with Transport for London’s chief operating officer for London Rail, Howard Smith, discussing the


improvements in London


Overground’s performance and the extension of the network, see page 42.


N


etwork Rail has been fined £3m for failings by its predecessor Railtrack over the Potters Bar crash in which seven people died.


The company had already admitted breaching safety regulations, which led to the London to King’s Lynn service derailing outside Potters Bar station in Hertfordshire in May 2002.


Network Rail admitted criminal guilt under the Safety at Work Act for faulty points on the tracks, the responsibility for which it inherited from Railtrack when it took it over in 2002.


The Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) dropped its pursuit of a linked case against engineering contractor Jarvis after it went into administration last year.


12 | rail technology magazine Apr/May 11


Nicholas Hilliard QC, for ORR, told the court that the poor state of one set of points on the track had made the crash “inevitable”.


In a statement, Network Rail said the railway was now safer than it has ever been.


It said: “This week marks the ninth anniversary of the terrible, tragic event at Potters Bar. We recognise


for many that the sorrow remains and we should all pause and reflect as we remember those who lost their lives.


“Network Rail has today been sentenced for failings that contributed to this accident and we accept the fine as we accept the liabilities inherited from Railtrack. We say again today that we are truly sorry.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228