This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.



Remember introducing a buffer feed will deliver more litres, cost effectively


Reducing bottlenecks and improving intakes


Step back and ask yourself - what is holding cows back from eating one more mouthful of feed? Here are a couple of examples. Too heavily stocked? Then consider cow spaces in a barn, will reducing stocking density actually increase overall yield, improve cow health and result in the same milk in the tank without any more feed. The answer is usually yes. Too low feed rails? Lifting these rails can be an easy solution to increasing dry matter intakes, or pushing up twice more in a day giving 1kg more dry matter intake - both simple, quick solutions which in turn will result in higher production from current feed levels which will subsequently drive the return from those marginal litres.





Table 2 Grazing herd supplemented with buffer* April


DMI from grass (kg) Milk from grass (litres) Buffer DMI (kg) Buffer cost (£)


Milk production (litres) Cost ppl of buffer


Income gain (milk 25ppl) Source: Advanced Nutrition


11 12 9


0.99 30


0.18 5.21


May 13


15 7


0.75 30


0.2 3.72


*Buffer based on grass silage, whole-crop wheat plus maize meal or maize silage.


I anticipate making more from grazed grass will be high on the spring agenda for many, at least for a % of cows in the herd, low risk, pregnant, late lactation cows, whether or not you roll out a rotational grazing or set stocking system. Remember introducing a buffer will deliver more litres, cost effectively. See table 2. Keeping fresh cows in until PD +ve will ensure a good start to lactation as well as ensuring the cows have the best chance possible of


June 16


18 4


0.44 30


0.27 2.96


getting back in calf and these cows will, therefore, have increased return - £6 a day for every reduced day open and similar figures to above for return on yield. However, turning later cows out with buffer feed will keep production up and will also help milk quality to give the return on investment.


Alternative feeds


Producers can look for alternative sources of feed to help reduce feed costs. However, they still need to show a return in production. A feed ingredient may sound good value, but may not result in improving performance. Therefore, before making any buying decisions it’s essential to compare two feeds for dry matter, energy and finally, protein. Use the equations in table 3 on each feed to compare overall value, for example, potatoes vs barley, brewers’ grains vs grass silage.


Since the main component of the diet in any system is


forage, it’s not too early to start thinking how to step up your silage making this season and improve clamp quality. With DM losses run- ning at up to 30%, there will be plenty of scope. First off, make sure you cut and harvest at the optimum time. Cut between 11am and 6pm, wilt as quickly as possible, condition within two hours of cutting, leave at the height of a mobile phone, clamp within the next 10 hours. Treat with an additive, pour a 20% salt solution over the top of the clamp and apply at 1 litre/m2


. I’ll be


offering some further key pointers to quality silage making in the next issue.


Table 3: How to calculate a feed’s key components Dry Matter (DM)


Energy


Price per tonne fresh weight/1000 = price per kg fresh weight/% DM = price per kg DM


Price per kg DM/ ME of feed in MJ/kg DM


= price per unit energy Protein


Price per kg DM/protein in %CP /kg DM = price per % protein


THE JOURNAL APRIL 2015 81


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116