search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PROCUREMENT


Procurement solutions can tackle the backlog


Estate management is an increasingly urgent issue for the UK government, which is facing a £49 bn public estate maintenance backlog, with £13.8 bn accounted for by the healthcare sector alone – more than twice the 2015/16 figure, highlighting a growing strain on healthcare infrastructure. With limited resources, NHS Trusts must now tap into available support. Here Jonathan Oram, director of Frameworks at procurement specialist, Pagabo, highlights how procurement solutions are key in effectively tackling the healthcare backlog crisis.


The struggle to ensure that NHS healthcare buildings remain fit-for-purpose is at a tipping point, and the mounting backlog maintenance costs for public estates highlight the strain that continues to stretch an already overburdened NHS, where many estates include ageing buildings. Improving healthcare infrastructure is a high priority for the government, as evidenced by the plans for new hospitals set out in New Hospital Programme (NHP). However, equally pressing – certainly in the short-to- medium term, is the fact that the existing estate needs to be refurbished, reconfigured, and revamped in many areas to continue to serve modern healthcare needs. However, for this to be done effectively, collaborative effort to deliver across client and project teams in a way that ensures top- quality clinical care, alongside overall value, will be key.


The cost of a crumbling estate The National Audit Office’s recent report (NAO), Maintaining public service facilities, published in January this year, spotlighting the staggering backlog in the UK’s estate maintenance, is not something we can suggest has come as a surprise. The detrimental effect on, and risks to, patient safety from issues such as poorly maintained buildings and M&E services are clear, but there are deeper cuts that continue to make the NHS bleed. These include treatment delays, cancelled procedures, and delays in discharge. As a construction sector, it can be easy for us to look at


Lincoln County Hospital Urgent Treatment Centre. Contractor – GF Tomlinson, procured through the Medium Works Framework.


healthcare buildings for what they are, but with the strain across NHS services continuing, it’s important for us to remember the people those buildings support. Tackling the estate maintenance backlog is thus about more than the structures that make up the NHS, but equally the imperative to restore the conditions necessary for timely, safe, and dignified healthcare.


Aligning with its report, the NAO has explored how


the estates backlog as a whole can be addressed. Standardisation is a top consideration, not only for ensuring compliance, but in support of long-term viability, which is the case if the NHS has to be a continued priority, and we are to build a healthcare system fit for the future. With the backlog increasingly impossible to ignore following the NAO’s high deficit figures, we can no longer deny that action is needed. We instead must turn our attention to how tackling these deficits can be done efficiently, safely, and at pace. Public sector procurement and the framework routes available offer an effective route for this. These are pre-tendered and compliant routes that can provide NHS Trusts with flexible and fast access to specialist providers across estates and facilities management specialties. From limited internal resources to inconsistent delivery standards, the practical challenges that NHS teams are facing can be supported through framework intervention. Here, Trusts can accelerate urgent maintenance works while standardising quality and compliance, without the burden of complex contracts and procurement cycles. The benefits of this process are frequently seen in


the work delivered through the frameworks Pagabo manages, including the Total Facilities Management Framework (TFM). This fallows for more than just reactive maintenance, and also supports proactive lifecycle planning, monitoring, and sustainability-focused upgrades, allowing us to shift from ‘firefighting’ to forward thinking.


Significant value offered NHS Estates teams should be focused on supply chain management and project delivery, which is where the deep value of frameworks – including the TFM framework and other sector-specific options – offer significant value. With many of the frameworks Pagabo manages being hosted by NHS Trusts themselves, their design has healthcare in mind throughout. This close alignment with operational realities, alongside extensive engagement with healthcare professionals and ongoing dialogue with Trusts, helps ensure that procurement processes reflect current needs, not outdated models. Sector-specific framework offerings especially can offer unique respite to the challenges of the declining healthcare estate. Designed with the unique pressures of healthcare facilities in mind – from space constraints in areas like A&E, to the risks of maintaining live sites throughout development – these frameworks offer more than just assistance; they provide tailored, up-to-date solutions. This means that Trusts don’t have to start from scratch when


52 Health Estate Journal September 2025


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132