search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
36 EMULSIFIERS The high skin tolerance of QSPP was proven


using in vitro and ex vivo tests that evaluated this ingredient’s impact on the skin microbiota commonly found in the face area. In vitro, the growth behaviour of these microorganisms was similar between cultures treated with QSPP versus the control, and there was no effect on the development of pathogenic microorganisms. A complementary ex vivo study was


conducted to assess QSPP’s effect on different groups of bacteria. Skin microbiota sampling was performed on human volunteers using a swab before and after the application of the test products and the results showed that QSPP did not affect the balance or diversity of the volunteers’ facial microbiota. Finally, an additional clinical test was


conducted to determine the protective effect of QSPP. In this study, skin irritation was induced by applying sodium lauryl sulfate patches to the backs of 20 human volunteers. After the removal of these patches, four gels containing either 2% or 5% QSPP, 2% sorbitan laurate, or 2% glyceryl stearate citrate were subsequently applied to the irritated areas, on each volunteer (their back having been divided into four areas to compare the efficacy of the products). Trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL), a


parameter representative of the barrier protection efficacy, was then measured after 30 minutes, one hour, two hours, and 24 hours. The results confirmed that the formula with 5% QSPP showed superior and quicker efficacy in significantly reducing TEWL compared to the standard emulsifiers and other test product (Figure 1). Due to the structure of the QSPP particles,


this ingredient remains at the surface of the skin and will not destabilize the skin organization, while acting as a barrier against water loss. This is a reason why QSPP has a rebalancing effect on the skin, thus keeping it moisturized all day long. In addition to its capacity to preserve the


microbiota and reinforce the skin barrier, QSPP offers another benefit directly related to its composition. Starches are well-known for their absorption properties and usually serve as mattifiers and sebum absorbers. To explore these properties further, QSPP


was tested on artificial skin made from a unique microfluidic based experimental set up to assess the product’s capacity to control


5.3 2.7 0


-2.7 -5.3


L R


5.3 2.7 0


-2.7 -5.3


Cream-free massage Formula with QSPP L R


6 3 0


-3 -6


Formula with benchmark emulsifier


Figure 2: fMRI imaging showing the activation of different brain areas linked to wellness and positive emotions following cream-free massage, the application of a formula containing QSPP, and a benchmark emulsifier


PERSONAL CARE February 2025 www.personalcaremagazine.com


TEWL variation after application on the skin of gels formulas containing 2 and 5% Pickmulse vs. other emulsifiers


QSPP 2% ■ QSPP 5% ■ Sorbitan laurate 2% ■ Glyceryl stearate citrate 2% ■ Control - non treated area ■


10 5 0


-5


-10 -15


-20 -25 -30


30 min 1h Time (h) * t-test Inter-groups comparison p<o0.05; ** t-test Inter-groups comparison p<0.01 Figure 1: Effect of QSPP on TEWL reduction


sebum production throughout the day. An emulsion of 20% oil phase with 5% QSPP or 3% polyglyceryl-2 sesquiisostearate and polyglyceryl-4 laurate was applied on artificial skin. After drying, injections of sebum were


conducted every ten minutes for eight hours and the L* parameter, an indicator of skin luminance, was measured. The results showed that, with QSPP, the L* response under sebum injection was kept under control, demonstrating the ability of the film to control the optical aspect of the skin for a long-lasting perfector effect. QSPP not only creates skin-friendly emulsions, it also allows these emulsions to have a pearly white appearance, which could previously only be obtained with synthetic- based emulsifiers. This property allows formulators to switch their consumers’ preferred formulas to a version with enhanced naturality or improved aspect. To facilitate this switch, QSPP offers two additional benefits: high confidence in the stability of the emulsion and the capacity to emulsify up to 20% oil, allowing QSPP to be used in a wide range of products from light


6 3 0


-3 -6


L R


5.4 2.7 0


-2.7 -5.4


sprays to rich creams. Moreover, this product’s unique properties facilitate the creation of water-in-oil-in-water (W/O/W) formulations, which can support the development of innovative textures by enhancing the sensory experience with a dynamic, cascading feel during application.


Using neuroscience to back up sensory benefits Beyond being a versatile emulsifier that simplifies formulation, QSPP also elevates the sensory experience, bringing innovative textures that foster a profound sense of wellbeing upon application. By enhancing both functionality and user experience, QSPP redefines what emulsifiers can achieve in modern cosmetic formulations. In a groundbreaking clinical study that


combined neuroscience and a patented evaluation method, 20 volunteers participated in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study. The volunteers applied simple emulsions of 20% oil phase with either 5% QSPP or 4% glyceryl stearate and PEG-100 stearate (a benchmark emulsifier).


5.4 2.7 0


-2.7 -5.4


-83% -80% -78% 2h 24h -121% -138% * * * ** * *


TEWL variation vs. T0 (%)


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92