This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Chapter 1: Regional Context and Priorities


governance. The National Environmental Action Plan and the National Strategy for Environmental Sustainability determine overall environmental goals and objectives while the Environmental Protection Authority is the main national environmental institution, though it works alongside other institutions such as the Ministry of Water and Environment. However, there are several other institutions and laws with overlapping scope and responsibilities (Almutawakel 2015; International Business Publications 2013; UNDP 2012). Additionally, inadequate technical and financial resources and a lack of access to appropriate information may hinder environmental governance in Yemen. These three countries mirror the status of environmental governance in many parts of West Asia.


Several countries in the region, including Bahrain, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia and Syria, specifically address the issue of environmental governance in their national plans. All countries address environmental issues through multiple plans, such as those related to climate change, ecosystem management, harmful and hazardous waste, disasters and conflicts, resource efficiency, and sustainable consumption and production. Even when countries of West Asia do address the environment, most of their resources are devoted to other matters that are perceived as more pressing, such as security and/or the economy, as public awareness of environmental issues remains low. The result is that governments are not pressed to devote additional effort and resources to address and streamline environmental issues (UNEP-ROWA 2015).


1.3.2 Enhancing environmental governance Participation


Effective governance requires that institutions are able to provide services to their constituents and that they have good relationships with other organisations, especially those representing stakeholders. The coordination of actors and programmes within the environment sector is a challenge everywhere, and more so in countries of the region where capacity and resources are often inadequate. This makes


environmental governance an even greater cause of concern. Rivalries are common among institutions, especially when there are many laws and strategies that often overlap, and as a result stakeholders become tangled in a web of rules and regulations over which they have little say or control (UNDP 2013).


It is important that stakeholders are involved in environmental decision-making processes, particularly as many of these decisions ultimately impact them or their immediate environment, for example waste collection and management, water and sanitation, and air and noise pollution. To date, environmental issues remain largely in the realm of national governments, with little participation from local authorities except to enforce or implement decisions (Samaha 2015; Stel et al. Husseini 2015).


Accountability and effectiveness


Involving stakeholders, including civil society organisations (CSOs), in decision-making processes and reaching decisions through consensus are key factors for accountable and effective environmental governance. In addition, involving stakeholders in follow-up activities can make public administrators and institutions more accountable. National capacities for accountability (Box 1.3.2) can be further improved through better access to data management and monitoring, human and financial resources, effective engagement of the private sector and civil society, and the generation, processing, analysis and dissemination of information in a transparent and enabling manner (Ghrer 2013; UNDP 2013).


Equality and equity


Since the environment generates benefits, it has a value, which should be protected by all those involved, including public, private and civil society organizations. Appropriate and fair policies are necessary to support social equity and equality, and could be achieved through a greater inclusion of all stakeholders, regardless of status, gender, age or power. Equality and equity, both within and between generations,


31


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156