This content requires Adobe Flash Player version
or later.
Either you do not have Adobe Flash Player installed,
or your version is too old,
or there is a problem with your Flash installation and we were unable to detect it.
necessarily be the case for some species, namely red-throated divers in relation to the OTE SPA.
RSPB
V2, p. 2-146 (section 2.5.4, mitigation measures). The RSPB considers the question of whether any project specific mitigation is required will need to be answered by the assessment of all final information (eg final CRA using 24 months of survey data). It would seem premature at this stage to assert that mitigation will not be required in the absence of this. It is also unclear as to why this statement is made in this section when the summary of the PEIR chapter suggests (para. 587) that a number of techniques and methods can be implemented to reduce potentially significant impacts during the project inception and development stages, such as timing of construction and maintenance works.
Table 12-1 Marine and Coastal Ornithology Consultation Responses
A more robust mitigation section (Section 12.7) is included within this chapter, along with a residual impacts section (Section 12.8).
Response to Consultation
Environmental Statement Volume 2- Offshore. Ornithology (Marine and Coastal)