This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Security


aid swift evacuation, control the spread of smoke and fumes, and make it easier to see suspicious packages, without any negative effect on the passenger experience.


Although it could be argued that any measure is worth taking if it increases passenger security, the reality is that a balance has to be found to improve security while avoiding a disproportionate impact on people’s daily journeys. The results of modelling air flow, fire and explosions in station environments, as well as pedestrian behaviour during evacuation are being used to inform the risk assessment and design guidelines, alongside existing security design guidance and best practice from across Europe.


travel time, ticket price, security and convenience, and public opinion on issues such as staffing levels, CCTV, lighting, public announcements, luggage restrictions and baggage screening. The results of the passenger survey will be published so operators can make use of the data in understanding public acceptability of potential new security measures.


Rail Prof_03_outline.pdf 1 9/17/2013 9:41:19 AM


Both ‘active’ measures (e.g. luggage screening or increased CCTV) and less intrusive ‘passive’ measures, such as improvements to the layout, design and materials of the buildings themselves are being considered in the current project. For example, certain materials and building techniques can be more resilient to fire and blast than others and the building layout can be designed to


The project will be completed by the end of 2013 and will deliver a risk assessment tool and comprehensive set of design guidelines for both new stations and station refurbishments. It is hoped these enable managers to make well informed choices regarding the security of the stations and achieve the best outcomes for the travelling public and for


sustainable business operation. • Emma Carter, David Fletcher, Jon Paragreen, University of Sheffield www.securestation.eu


C M Y CM MY CY CMY K


November 2013 Page 61


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140