This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
ABCDE Arts&Style sunday, december 26, 2010


MOVIES Peeling back time to


’70s struggles Filmmaker Tanya Hamilton’s “Night Catches Us” looks at the emotional side of the Black Panther era. E3


BLOGSANDCHATS washingtonpost.com/style ’Freedom Riders’ Filmmaker hopes his documentary inspires a new generation E11 Virtual Choir The next YouTube choir may have thousands of singers E9


Ask Amy, E12 Celebrations, E11 Cul de Sac, E12 Movie Guide, E8 Horoscope, E12 Lively Arts Guide, E5


ONLOVE A submariner’s


surface attraction The first few times they met, things did not go well. Then a short separation helped the romance develop. E10


TVREVIEW


The holiday season culminates with the birth of a new cable empire for the televangelist of talk. All together now, faithful followers: O come, let us adore her.


E AX FN FS LF PW DC BD PG AA FD HO MN MS SM


G


ranting an hour-long, prime-time in- terviewto her friendBarbaraWalters this month, Oprah Winfrey spoke of self-sacrifice in such a way that the taping ought to have taken place in theGardenofGethsemane.


In preparing towrap up 25 years of her daytime


talk show, the epic cultural influence of which defiesmeasurement, and start the OprahWinfrey Network (OWN),whichwill be filledwith purpose- driven lifestyle programming and seen in some 80 million households,Winfrey toldWalters she sees herself neither as billionaire nor celebrity. In the end, she is but a vessel ofGod: “Use me,” Winfrey said she asks the Lord. “Use


me until you useme up.” She has a way of basking too often in the very


miracle of herself — a poor Southern black child lifted to global prominence—and yet her real skill is howshe invites you to bask in your ownmiracu- lousness. Everything is geared toward becoming, rejuvenating and, appropriately enoughto thenew year, resolving. Your personal sense of Oprahness,


(The OprahWinfrey Network) BY HANK STUEVER


aswell as your ability tobe everythingOprahhopes you canbe, is entirely up to . . . you. This Oprah-as-earthen-vessel notion stuck with


me as I dived into previews of some of the shows thatwill be seen onOWNwhen it launches at noon onNewYear’sDay. While far from perfect, the network is suffused


withadesire toennoble, share, cleanse andelevate. Admiring what turned out to be a fairly nutritious array of new ideas in OWN’s initial offerings, I foundmyself imagining the world a few centuries from now. There is only one prediction to make about the future (and I’mnot the first tomake it), and it is this: Therewill beOprah churches all over the world. OWN is just one step in a process that will more fully (and valiantly, it turns out) spread theOprahworldview. I’m not sure how these churches will reconcile


themany theological qualms that will arise—can Oprah align with the Trinity? etc.—but one thing Oprah church historians will have, barring any


oprah continued on E2


Some people think Washington is anti-fashion. So wrong. It’s part of our power statement.


ROBIN GIVHAN On Fashion


T


he common reaction from folks outside the Beltway has always been surprise that this


newspaper—headquartered in the land of Dockers, Lands’ End satchels and sensible shoes—takes its fashion coverage seriously. After all,NewYork is the heart of the


country’s fashion industry and Washington—by virtue of its proximity toManhattan—has always suffered in sartorial comparisons. The nation’s capital has also fared poorly when considered alongside Los Angeles, even though that’s a fashion landscape best known for overpriced jeans and velour sweat suits. Those juxtapositions have always


seemed unfair.NewYork has an outsize population of fashion world denizens.


If they aren’t paying special attention to trends and high style, then who will? And film, the singular business of Los Angeles, is a visual medium. Obsessing about one’s looks is in an actor’s job description. YetWashington has its own unique


relationship with the fashion industry, and for the past 15 years I’ve been honored to report on it. And now, as I prepare to leave The Post for a challenging adventure atNewsweek and The Daily Beast, I’mreminded of how much I have been shaped and energized byWashington style, which has always been about so much more than merely clothes. In a city that overflows with


intellectual curiosity, residents are fascinated by this billion-dollar industry that thrives by tapping into our deepest fantasies, insecurities and prejudices. Fashion seeps into our subconscious and influences the way in which we see ourselves and those around us. Even when we pretend not to care about the clothes in the glossy advertisements, we are still bothered by the models. They are too thin, too


givhan continued on E6 DANNY MOLOSHOK/ASSOCIATED PRESS


The Coen brothers: Critic Ann Hornaday ranks their movies, while


CHARLIE NEIBERGALL/ASSOCIATED PRESS


INAUGURALLOOK: Chronicling the first lady’s style has meant studying her ball gowns as well as her shorts (when she went to the Grand Canyon).


fans pick faves. Pages E4-5


JOHANNA GOODMAN FOR THE WASHINGTON POST


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156