devolution deal. There is no plan B other than to wait potentially years for another opportunity from another government to come around and continue to have decisions made about important local issues being made in London.”
Blackpool Council leader Lynn Williams, added: “This deal is important in terms of what it can bring now but also in the future. We will have much more control over adult skills and will be able to upskill our workforce. This in turn will affect our ability to attract inward investment and really make the most of it.
“The competition for investment is not within Lancashire itself but other parts of the country and so we in Lancashire need to work together. If devolution does not go ahead, it is likely to mean Lancashire and therefore Blackpool could get left behind compared to other areas who benefit from devolution.”
Deal or no deal?: Page 8 Frankly Speaking DEVOLUTION: WE HAVE TO START
SOMEWHERE By Frank McKenna
Downtown Lancashire in Business
The devo deal offered to Lancashire has been criticised by some district council leaders as lacking ambition – and for excluding them from the new combined authority.
The fact is a more pragmatic and less parochial approach is now needed from our political leaders.
I remember when the first Devo-Manc deal was announced in Greater Manchester.
Leaders there were disappointed that what they got did not include any financial powers. Eight years later, that has now changed. Andy Burnham and his colleagues have also added a range of powers to those agreed in that initial agreement.
Equally, when Liverpool accepted to create an elected city mayor in 2012, I think the cash award was around £30m.
Eleven years later, there is a Liverpool City Region Combined Authority which has powers over a host of strategic policy areas, including economic development, transport, and skills and training, with a budget of around £600m.
The point is, Lancashire is at the start of a long journey. Is the deal the most exciting I have ever seen? Of course not. But we have to start somewhere, and this gives the county something to build on.
Although I have some sympathy with district leaders who complain that they have no place on the new combined authority, I would ask them to reflect on whether they have been engaging in the devolution debate in good faith – or simply trying to erect barrier-after-barrier in the hope that the status quo would prevail.
That is not a sustainable approach. Lancashire businesses are fed up watching investment for Further Education, skills, Innovation Zones, improved transport connectivity, and business support programmes pour into Manchester, Liverpool, and Leeds.
Lancashire can only hope to win that type of support if we embark on this new opportunity in a positive fashion.
The first page of any devolution story is seldom as dynamic as places hope. But it is the next page, the next chapter, the story’s end that is important.
Will our political leaders work with the business community to write a positive, progressive narrative to build on the introduction – or will they rip up the script before it has a chance to develop? The business community is watching – and our patience is wearing thin.
LANCASHIREBUSINES SV
IEW.CO.UK Lancaster Castle hosted the signing
7
IN VIEW
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76
