7.4 Student A
Sufficient consideration
In order for the consideration to be good enough to provide the basis for the formation of a contract it must be sufficient. This means that it must have some economic value, even if that economic value is minimal. If a person promises not to complain about something in return for some financial benefit, this promise has no economic value and is therefore not sufficient consideration.
This was decided in the case of White v Bluett (1853) 23 LJ where it was held that a promise by a son that he would stop complaining that he was being treated differently to his other siblings in return for his father releasing him from payment of a debt was not sufficient consideration and there was therefore no contract. Pollock CB stated that: ‘In reality there is no consideration. The son has no right to complain as the father can do what he liked with the money and the son abstaining from doing something he had no right to do is no consideration.’
7.4 Student B
Adequate consideration
Although consideration has to have an economic value, it does not have to be adequate. In other words, the consideration does not have to represent the realistic economic worth of what is given in return.
In Midland Bank v Green [1981] AC 513 the husband conveyed a farm to his wife for £500 even though the property was worth more than £40,000 in order to prevent his son from acquiring title to the property, following a family dispute. The House of Lords held that the wife was the purchaser under section 4(6) of the Land Charges Act and refused to imply into the section that the purchaser must provide valuable consideration.
103
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139