search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
WATER SYSTEM SAFETY


DELABIE THERMOSTATIC TECHNOLOGY SHW


SCW


Temperature control No non-return valves Mixed water


Mixed opening control Mixing chamber


SMW By closing the control


The thermostatic cell therefore closes the SCW. There is no risk of cross-flow between the SHW and SCW.


enter the mixing chamber so that the pre-set maximum temperature is not exceeded – typically between 38 °C and 44 °C depending on the application. Maintenance staff can also override the temperature limiter to undertake thermal shocks, but the user is unable to override the limiter, avoiding accidental scalding in day-to-day use. But there is still a risk of scalding for those vulnerable cohorts identified earlier. So, what is the solution?


‘Next generation’ TMVs Interestingly, the solution lies with the very same failsafe technology that enables TMVs to provide anti-scalding safety. For conventional TMVs the closing mechanism is located upstream of the mixing chamber. When the mixer is turned on, hot and cold water flow into the mixing chamber, where the thermostatic cell regulates pressure and temperature imbalances in the incoming water prior to delivery. The reason that cross-flow occurs is that the mixing chamber is subject to static pressure. If there is a sudden imbalance in pressure – for example due to simultaneous toilet flushes (as above), the imbalance will cause the mixed water to seek the path of least resistance, or lowest pressure. To guard against this, NRVs are installed on the inlets to prevent the pressure imbalance forcing hot water into the cold water supply pipes. At least a decade prior to the French ban on NRVs, Delabie’s engineers developed sequential thermostatic technology, which ensures that the water flow is controlled upstream of the mixing chamber. This ensures that the mixing chamber is not subject to static pressure, so there can be no cross-flow due to pressure imbalances, eliminating the need for NRVs. The mixer opens with only cold water, and the hot water only begins to flow when the lever is in the vertical position and the thermostatic cell starts to blend the hot and cold, taking into account pressure and temperature variations in the system. The anti- scalding failsafe technology reacts immediately if there is a cold water supply failure, shutting off the hot water supply. Likewise, if the hot water supply fails, the cold shuts off too, meeting the TMV3 requirements for failsafe.


, the SHW is closed.


CONVENTIONAL THERMOSTATIC TECHNOLOGY SHW SCW


Temperature control Non-return valves Mixed water


Mixed opening control Mixing chamber


SMW


Sooner or later, the non-return valves are obstructed by impurities, causing cross-flow between the SHW and the SCW, responsible for bacterial development.


Delabie’s wall-mounted sequential TMTs also feature


an often-overlooked component that has revolutionised hygiene in healthcare settings. Designed to isolate the water supply in front of the IPS panel, the Stop/Check connector allows the mixer to be removed for cleaning, descaling, and maintenance, without the inconvenience of removing the panels. Furthermore, the ability to isolate the water supply means that a failsafe check takes place in seconds.


If we return to our earlier example, a conventional mixer requires 30 minutes per year to check the failsafe and NRVs. The Delabie sequential TMV has no NRVs, and the failsafe check takes 10 seconds per mixer, a total of 20 seconds per year. These Stop/Check connectors are available on Delabie’s wall-mounted sequential thermostatic mixers and showers, offering improved user safety for patients and healthcare professionals wherever there is a scalding and infection risk, all while reducing the burden for over-stretched maintenance teams.


Conclusion Once poster boys for anti-scalding safety, TMV mixers have fallen from grace. Increased infection risks and onerous maintenance regimes have seen Estates teams replace TMVs where the risk of scalding can be mitigated through mechanical means. However, next-generation thermostatic sequential technology offers a new solution when faced with the perennial challenge of balancing anti-scalding risks with Legionella infection risks. User safety is still guaranteed thanks to the familiar anti-scalding failsafe, but without arduous servicing and maintenance routines. Perhaps it’s time to let the next generation of thermostatic mixing valves show their mettle?


References 1 Health & Safety Executive: Legionnaire’s disease Technical guidance HSG274 Part 2, Published March 2024. https:// tinyurl.com/4y5yuzc5


2 Association française de normalisation (AFNOR), NF Médical (DT077), I June 2017.


Conventional TMT versus Delabie’s sequential thermostatic technology.


Carole Armstrong


Carole Armstrong is the Senior Marketing manager for Delabie UK. A graduate of both Cardiff University and Manchester College, she joined the company 15 years ago. Fluent in French, and responsible for numerous high- impact communication campaigns, she is responsible for media relations and events, delivering online and print content for the UK market. Delabie says it is ‘the European market-leader for tapware and sanitary accessories, providing innovative, hygienic, and sustainable solutions for the non-domestic market’.


October 2024 Health Estate Journal 81


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132