search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS


Decarbonising allied to healthy design principles


Amid shifting budget constraints and pressing Net Zero targets, M&E designers and architects are re-evaluating the way they approach the design of healthcare facilities. However, says Steve Richmond, head of Marketing and Technical at Rehau Building Solutions, it is critical that these new considerations do not impact the wellbeing of patients and staff. Here he discusses the importance of instilling healthy design principles ‘to facilitate truly sustainable growth for the sector’.


As numerous research and academic studies have shown, and indeed practical experience in hospitals and other healthcare facilities have demonstrated, well-designed buildings are key to the provision of quality healthcare. This is a subject that has formed the centrepiece of many pieces of academic research, with the Design Council’s Future Health: Sustainable Places for Health and Wellbeing report among a raft of published documents highlighting the impact of building design on occupant performance in this sector. The importance of good healthcare facilities was


Below left: Well-designed buildings are key to the provision of quality healthcare.


Below right: In an effort to address concerns, the then government pledged £3.7 bn for the construction of 40 new hospitals by 2030.


brought into sharper focus than ever before during the pandemic, with a number of specialist buildings created to help bring effective care to COVID-19 patients. Perhaps the most well-known example were the emergency Nightingale Hospitals, which were constructed in London, Birmingham, Manchester, Bristol, Exeter, Sunderland, Belfast, and Harrogate.


Pressure to decarbonise Added to the many different considerations for those involved in designing healthcare buildings is the growing pressure to decarbonise the built environment in the face of fast-approaching Net Zero targets. Given that the healthcare sector accounts for around 4.6% of global carbon emissions, the onus is on the sector to play its part in this transition, and – against this backdrop – there has


never been a more pertinent time to ensure that healthcare facilities are ‘healthy by design’, both in terms of occupant wellbeing and environmental impact.


Market challenges In short, the concept of ‘healthy by design’ is to ensure that facilities are constructed with current and future challenges in mind. While occupant wellbeing and sustainability appear to be the headline issues here, there are a number of wider considerations that health estate designers must take into account. Primarily, buildings constructed for NHS usage must adhere to strict safety standards. While some guidance on best practice is provided through the Department of Health and Social Care’s Health Building Notes, there is no indication as to how this should be achieved.


Alongside the construction of new buildings, designers must also contest with rapidly ageing building stock. The extent of this challenge was highlighted by data released in 2018-19, detailing a £6.8 bn maintenance backlog, of which £3.4 bn related to issues that presented a ‘high or significant risk to patients and staff’. This challenge has been exacerbated by the UK’s ageing population, with both men and women now living longer than ever, placing increased stress on public healthcare facilities. In an effort to address these concerns, the then government pledged £3.7 bn for the construction of


108 Health Estate Journal October 2024


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132