search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS


Preventing unattended alarms leading to a crisis


Kevin Brown, managing director at BlueSky Wireless, and ICON’s Richard Salvage, highlight ‘the potentially catastrophic consequences’ of unattended alarms in healthcare. Here they explore why messaging, automation, and monitoring are crucial factors in mitigating risk.


In the high-stakes environment of UK hospitals, where every second counts, the role of a Building Management System (BMS) cannot be overstated. This sophisticated network of interconnected systems ensures the safety, health, and operational efficiency of hospital facilities. When these systems function correctly, they provide the backbone for seamless healthcare delivery. However, when they fail – especially when alarms go unattended – the consequences can be severe, and even life-threatening. The essence of a BMS lies in its ability to monitor and control various critical building functions, ranging from heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems to power supplies, medical gas systems, and fire safety protocols. The BMS generates alarms whenever an anomaly or failure occurs. These alarms can indicate anything from a minor inconvenience, like a non-critical system warning, to a dire emergency – such as a power outage in a critical care unit, where patients depend on life support systems. Ignoring or delaying the response to these alarms can lead to catastrophic outcomes, not only risking patient lives, but also threatening the hospital’s operational continuity and financial stability.


The traditional approach – a manual process rife with risks Despite the vital importance of these alarms, many hospitals continue to rely on outdated and manual processes to manage them. Traditionally, alarms generated by the BMS are displayed in a colour- coded list on a PC monitor located in the hospital’s switchboard room. Here, operators are tasked with the dual responsibility of answering calls and monitoring these alarms. This set-up places a significant burden on operators, who must continuously scan the monitor for new alerts while juggling other responsibilities. The potential for human error in such a system is high, as operators might overlook or delay the recognition of a critical alarm due to the sheer volume of tasks they manage. Once an operator identifies a high-priority alert, the


process of notifying the appropriate personnel begins. This typically involves making a phone call to the relevant individual or team, passing on a message that may contain minimal information due to the operator’s limited understanding of the situation. If the primary contact cannot be reached, the procedure dictates that the operator reviews the escalation protocol to find the next suitable recipient. This method is not only time-consuming, but also fraught with the potential for miscommunication, delays, and, in some cases, complete failure to notify the necessary personnel.


One of the standout features of the BlueSky Messaging System is its versatility in delivering messages. This flexibility is particularly important in hospital environments, where staff members are constantly on the move.


The manual process of alarm management is


inherently flawed. It relies heavily on the vigilance and efficiency of human operators, who are prone to fatigue and distraction. In busy hospital environments, where the volume of incoming calls and alarms can be overwhelming, the likelihood of an alarm being missed or inadequately addressed increases significantly. Furthermore, the manual process lacks the ability to provide real-time, detailed information about the nature of the alarm, leaving responders with little context to act swiftly and appropriately. In scenarios where time is of the essence – such as during a fire alarm or a power failure in a critical care unit – every second of delay in response can escalate the situation from manageable to disastrous. The absence of automated, reliable systems to manage these alarms not


October 2024 Health Estate Journal 73


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132