INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL
How has thinking adapted since COVID-19?
COVID-19 highlighted gaps in public knowledge about infection prevention, emphasising the importance of Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) in healthcare design. In this first article in a three-part series, associate director for Healthcare at HLM Architects, Neil Orpwood, discusses IPC in healthcare design, and specifically the importance of early collaboration among designers, architects, and IPC teams in creating safe healthcare environments. He also asks how our healthcare IPC design has adapted four years on from COVID-19.
The fact that the Government needed to tell us how to wash our hands properly during the pandemic highlighted that there is a huge gap in infection control knowledge among the vast majority of the general population. COVID-19 led to a dramatic turning point in the general awareness of infection prevention and control (IPC) as a discipline, thereby casting a light on its importance in hospitals and other healthcare facilities – perhaps one of the few positive interventions that can greatly improve the overall outcome. In this, the first of three articles covering IPC in healthcare design, we ask ourselves: ‘Four years on from COVID-19, how has our healthcare IPC design adapted?’
The relevant know-how at the right time At the Healthcare Infection Society (HIS) conference 2023, HLM were the only architects in the room, yet as lead designers, architects are often front and centre in informing the successful outcomes of good infection control. The conference highlighted that lack of knowledge and early collaboration across IPC considerations within design and construction teams can hamper the successful delivery of projects, specifically delaying from design through to handover and commissioning. As is the case with many other specialist skills areas, this could be resolved through the involvement of IPC consultants and teams from the outset of a project, as specified in the guidance. However, in reality, there are barriers to achieving this; namely time constraints and gaps in knowledge. HIS acknowledges that this process could also be improved by the upskilling of design teams,
particularly at the early stages, where key strategic decisions are made which do not necessarily need detailed knowledge of IPC best practice, but can really help make the difference between a barely compliant project, and one that has outstanding infection control features, with the collective goal of improving patient safety for the life of the building.
Not just a ‘tick box’ exercise Operationally, the thoughtful planning and careful consideration of clinical spaces is key, and should not be seen just as a ‘tick box’ exercise, or simply a key element in complying with NHS requirements for gateway approvals. How many of us fully understand how space standards can help to reduce the potential for transmission of airborne infection through the spread of respiratory particles in a space, and that the standards are not just about the physical movement of the patients and staff? How many designers fully appreciate just how ‘unclean’ a basin or sink can potentially become through misuse or poor installation? By designing in IPC, designers,
architects, engineers, Estates and facilities managers, and planners, can work in a collaborative
Set over two storeys and 18,500m² of clinical space, the Ysbyty Cwm Cynon (Cynon Valley Hospital) north of Cardiff provides 128 rehabilitation beds, children’s services, a supporting therapies unit, outpatient clinics, and a significant mental health unit for community outpatient and elderly inpatient care.
Left: Visting time at Edinburgh Children’s Hospital.
October 2024 Health Estate Journal 47
Photos courtesy Trevor Burrows Photography
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132
