search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Pulse


SPORTS BETTING ONIONSACK


Natural language technology has redefined the betting experience. Onionsack CEO, Jonathan Power, details the Irish software-as-a-service company's journey from niche provider to cutting-edge technology partner.


Word of Mouth


From working with the Tote, we first concentrated on horse racing and football, but we've been able to adapt the platform over time to understand bets on all major sports and have recently added the Big Four US Sports.


Jonathan Power, Chief Executive Officer, Onionsack


Watching Euro 2020 this summer, with England getting all the way to the final, brought back memories of another football tournament at a really important time for Onionsack. Te 2006 World Cup was when we started.


A technology company that enables businesses in the sports betting industry to take bets safely and accurately via natural language, our very first client was the UK Tote. And our very first bet? England to win that World Cup.


From that day until now over 100 million bets have been placed with betting operators via Onionsack, directly from customer expression. We've been processing bets sent in natural language since 2006 - now it's in the millions every month - and from that we've learned so much.


P90 WIRE / PULSE / INSIGHT / REPORTS


Onionsack took its first bet by a mobile phone SMS in 2006 for the UK Tote. Te big fear was putting the wrong bet on and a customer losing what would otherwise have won. Although as this very first bet was on an England World Cup win we had nothing to worry about!


With Tote Jackpots that was a lot of money at stake for a small bet. Tankfully it never happened. And still hasn’t.


Te most popular bets then were actually a lot different to what they are now. Apart from accas we would get a lot of bets on which teams would win their group. Tis was before in-play betting - which has really taken off - so most bets were team to win in 90 minutes and first player to score.


Now we see bets that didn’t exist then - such as win and both teams to score, over/under 2.5 goals and, of course, loads of in-play bets like who will score next.


From being a niche provider helping to reduce costs for retail and online operators of the bets placed on horse races at their telephone betting centres, Onionsack's platform has become


front and centre in today's messaging-app centred world.


Tanks to the expertise harnessed from our deep machine-learning algorithms, which process millions of bets each month to progressively crystallise patterns and distil instructive data points, Onionsack understands what a customer wants to bet on via messages written or spoken and then places it on behalf of the customer. We are the only company that does this.


As we've grown and developed we've become more expert at understanding punter expression. Instead of forcing a straitjacket on customers, making them bet in a certain way, we've learned


Onionsack:


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128