Does REDD+ have a chance? 731
BURGESS, N.D., BAHANE, B., CLAIRS, T.,DANIELSEN, F.,DALSGAARD, S., FUNDER,M. et al. (2010) Getting ready for REDD+ in Tanzania: a case study of progress and challenges. Oryx, 44, 339–351.
CAPITANI, C., VAN SOESBERGEN, A., MUKAMA, K., MALUGU, I., MBILINYI, B., CHAMUYA, N. et al. (2019) Scenarios of land use and land cover change and their multiple impacts on natural capital in Tanzania. Environmental Conservation, 46, 17–24.
CAPLOW, S., PUTRI, A.A.D. & KWEKA, D.L. (2014) Piloting REDD in Zanzibar through community forest management, Tanzania. In REDD+ on the Ground (ed. E.O. Sills), pp. 234–244. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
DOKKEN, T., CAPLOW, S., ANGELSEN,A.&SUNDERLIN,W.D. (2014) Tenure issues in REDD+ pilot project sites in Tanzania. Forests, 5, 234–255.
DUCHELLE, A.E., SIMONET, G., SUNDERLIN,W.D. &WUNDER,S. (2018) What is REDD+ achieving on the ground? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 32, 134–140.
EDWARDS, D.P., KOH, L.P. & LAURANCE,W.F.(2012) Indonesia’s REDD+ pact: saving imperilled forests or business as usual? Biological Conservation, 151, 41–44.
EILOLA, S., FAGERHOLM, N., MÄKI, S., KHAMIS,M.&KÄYHKÖ,N. (2015) Realization of participation and spatiality in participatory forest management—a policy–practice analysis from Zanzibar, Tanzania. Journal of Environmental Planning, 58, 1242–1269.
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE FUND (2018) Mapping Forest Finance: a Landscape of Available Sources of Finance for REDD+ and Climate Action in Forests.
edf.org/sites/default/files/documents/ EDF101-REDD%2BFinance.pdf [accessed 3 February 2020].
FLETCHER, R., DRESSLER,W., BUSCHER,B.&ANDERSON, Z.R. (2016) Questioning REDD+ and the future of market-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 30, 673–675.
HENDERS, S., PERSSON, U.M. & KASTNER,T. (2015) Trading forests: land-use change and carbon emissions embodied in production and exports of forest-risk commodities. Environmental Research Letters, 10, 125012.
HINSLEY, A., ENTWISTLE,A.&PIO, D.V. (2015) Does the long-term success of REDD+ also depend on biodiversity? Oryx, 49, 216–221.
HOSONUMA, N., HEROLD, M., DE SY,V., DE FRIES, R., BROCKHAUS, M., VERCHOT, L. et al. (2012) An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries. Environmental Research Letters, 7, 1–12.
JAYACHANDRAN, S., DE LAAT, J., LAMBIN, E.F., STANTON, C.Y., AUDY,R.&THOMAS, N.E. (2017) Cash for carbon: a randomized trial of payments for ecosystem services to reduce deforestation. Science, 357, 267–273.
KATANI, J.Z., MUSTALAHTI, I., MUKAMA,K. & ZAHABU,E.(2016) Participatory forest carbon assessment in south-eastern Tanzania: experiences, costs and implications for REDD+ initiatives. Oryx, 50, 523–532.
KWEKA, D., CARMENTA, R., HYLE, M., MUSTALAHTI, I., DOKKEN,T. &BROCKHAUS,M.(2015) The Context of REDD+ in Tanzania: Driver, Agents and Institutions. Occasional Paper no. 133. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
LARSON, A.M., BROCKHAUS, M., SUNDERLIN,W.D., DUCHELLE, A., BABON, A., DOKKEN,
T.etal. (2013) Land tenure and REDD+: the good, the bad and the ugly. Global Environmental Change, 23, 678–689.
LUND, J.F., SUNGUSIA, E., MABELE, M.B. & SCHEBA,A. (2017) Promising change, delivering continuity: REDD+ as conservation
fad.World Development, 89, 124–139.
MCDERMOTT, C.L. (2017) Whose forests, whose gain? Nature Climate Change, 7, 386.
PHELPS, J.,WEBB, E.L. & AGRAWAL,A. (2010) Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance? Science, 328, 312–313.
RAVIKUMAR, A., LARJAVAARA, M., LARSON,A.&KANNINEN,M. (2017) Can conservation funding be left to carbon finance? Evidence from participatory future land use scenarios in Peru, Indonesia, Tanzania, and Mexico. Environmental Research Letters, 12, 014015.
REVOLUTIONARY GOVERNMENT OF ZANZIBAR (2008) Zanzibar National Forest Resources Management Plan (2008–2020). The Revolutionary Government of Zanzibar, Zanzibar.
REVOLUTIONARY GOVERNMENT OF ZANZIBAR (2014) Zanzibar’s Climate Change Strategy. The Revolutionary Government of Zanzibar, Zanzibar.
ROBINSON, E.J. & LOKINA, R.B. (2012) Efficiency, enforcement and revenue tradeoffs in participatory forest management: an example from Tanzania. Environment and Development Economics, 17, 1–20.
ROBINSON, E.J., ALBERS,H.J., MESHACK,C. & LOKINA,R.B.(2013) Implementing REDD through community-based forest management: lessons from Tanzania. Natural Resources Forum, 37, 141–152.
ROYAL NORWEGIAN EMBASSY (2015) Final Review of the Project. Piloting REDD+ in Zanzibar through Community Forest Management, June 2015. NIRAS, Vantaa, Finland.
SANDBROOK, C., NELSON, F., ADAMS,W.M. & AGRAWAL,A.(2010) Carbon, forests and the REDD paradox. Oryx, 44, 330–334.
SCHEBA,A.&RAKOTONARIVO, O.S. (2016) Territorialising REDD+: conflicts over market-based forest conservation in Lindi, Tanzania. Land Use Policy, 57, 625–637.
SEYMOUR,F.&BUSCH,J.(2016) Why Forests? Why Now? The Science, Economics, and Politics of Tropical Forests and Climate Change. Brookings Institution Press, Center for Global Development, Washington, DC, USA.
SHERIFF,A.(1987) Slaves, Spices and Ivory in Zanzibar: Integration of an East African Commercial Empire Into the World Economy, 1770– 1873. Ohio University Press, Athens, USA.
SIEX,K.S. (2011) Protected Area Spatial Planning for Unguja and Pemba Islands, Zanzibar.Wildlife Conservation Society, Zanzibar, Tanzania.
SILLS, E.O., STIBNIATI, S.A., DE SASSI, C., DUCHELLE, A.E., KWEKA, D.L., PRADNJA, I.A.R. & SUNDERLIN,W.D. (eds) (2014) REDD+ on the Ground: ACase Book of Subnational Initiatives Across the Globe. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor Barat, Indonesia.
SIMONET, G., KARSENTY, A., DE PERTHUIS, C., NEWTON,P.& SCHAAP,B.(2014) REDD+ Projects in 2014: An Overview Based on a New Database and Typology. Information and Debate Series No 32. Paris-Dauphine University, Paris, France.
SUNDERLIN,W.D., SILLS, E.O., DUCHELLE, A.E., EKAPUTRI, A.D., KWEKA, D., TONIOLO, A. et al. (2015) REDD+ at a critical juncture: assessing the limits of polycentric governance for achieving climate change mitigation. International Forestry Review, 17, 400–413.
SUTTA,H.E.&SILAYO, D.A. (2014) REDD+ Piloting process in the Zanzibar Islands, Tanzania: the assessment of the community’s perceptions and attitudes. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 7, 548–560.
TERRA GLOBAL CAPITAL (2014) HIMA (Hifadhi ya Misitu ya Asili ya jamii) REDD+ Program PD v-0-19 DRAFT.
vcsprojectdatabase.org/ #/pipeline_details/PL1381 [accessed 27 March 2018].
THOMPSON, M.C., BARUAH,M.&CARR, E.R. (2011) Seeing REDD+ as a project of environmental governance. Environmental Science & Policy, 14, 100–110.
TURCHIN,P.(2003) Historical Dynamics: Why States Rise and Fall. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
UISSO, A.J., CHIRWA, P.W., ACKERMAN,P.A.&MBWAMBO,L.(2019) Forestmanagementandconservationbefore andafter the introduction of village participatory land use plans in the Kilosa district REDD+ initiative, Tanzania. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 38, 97–115.
WEST, T.A. (2016) Indigenous community benefits from a de-centralized approach to REDD+ in Brazil. Climate Policy, 16, 924–939.
Oryx, 2021, 55(5), 725–731 © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605319001376
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164
