search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Distance sampling with camera traps 669


FIG. 1 Study area in the trans-Himalayan region and subalpine region of the Upper Bhagirathi basin, with the locations of camera traps used for estimating densities of the bharal Pseudois nayaur, and Himalayan musk deer Moschus leucogaster, respectively. The inset map shows the location of the Bhagirathi basin in Uttarakhand State, Western Himalaya, India.


rocks or in valleys could remain undetected, irrespective of their distance from the observer. Camera traps are an efficient tool for detecting elusive


and rare species in remote habitats (Burton et al., 2015; Rovero & Zimmermann, 2016), and extending the point transect method to accommodate data from camera traps could help solve some of the issues related to the violation of the assumptions underlying classic distance sampling (Howe et al., 2017). Distance sampling with camera traps has recently been tested for estimating the populations of Maxwell’s duiker Philantomba maxwellii (Howe et al., 2017) and the western chimpanzee Pan troglodytes versus (Cappelle et al., 2019) in Côte d’Ivoire.However, the efficacy of this technique in mountainous terrain has yet to be tested. Mountain ungulates are threatened by hunting for meat


and body parts (Sathyakumar et al., 2013a,b), habitat loss (Namgail et al., 2007; Kittur et al., 2010) and competition with livestock (Mishra et al., 2004; Bhattacharya et al., 2012b) throughout theHimalaya. Here,we focused on theHimalayan


blue sheep or bharal Pseudois nayaur and the Himalayanmusk deer Moschus leucogaster, both of which are affected by anthropogenic impacts (Mishra et al., 2004; Bhattacharya & Sathyakumar, 2011). The bharal is a social species of the Caprinae subfamily. It is associated with alpine and steppe mountain pastures, and subalpine slopes devoid of tree cover (2,500–5,500 m; Prater, 1980;Sathyakumar & Bhatnagar, 2002). The species is categorized as Least Concern on the IUCN Red List and listed in Schedule I of the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. In contrast, the Himalayan musk deer is solitary and sedentary, remain- ing within a defined home range throughout the year. The musk deer, a primitive deer-like ruminant, is a member of the family Moschidae. In the Indian Himalayan region, the southern side of the Greater Himalaya, it is restricted to areas between 2,500mand the treeline (Green, 1985; Sathyakumar et al., 2013b). It is categorized as Endangered on the IUCN Red List (Timmins & Duckworth, 2015) and listed in the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, in Schedule I.


Oryx, 2021, 55(5), 668–676 © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S003060532000071X


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164