search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
696 S. Kumbhojkar et al.


National Park, Pakistan, the leopard similarly subsistedmain- ly on domestic animals, with goats predominating (64.9%) the frequency of occurrence (Shehzad et al., 2015). The differences between our results and other studies are


a consequence of the high number of dogs and cats in our study area. The total dog and cat populations in the area are estimated to be c. 32,500 and 7,500 individuals, respectively (J. Reece, pers. comm., 2019); these species are thus widely available. Cattle and goats are relatively less abundant (31%) because these animals are herded during the day and pro- tected in enclosures at night. Similarly, in Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Mumbai, leopards have adapted to the de- pleted wild ungulate prey base by feeding on dogs found in the surrounding areas and by scavenging on buffalo car- casses (Edgaonkar & Chellam, 2002). In spite of the higher frequency of goats in the leopard


scats we analysed, the relative biomass of cattle was higher, a result of the greater weight of cattle. A similar finding was made in the study of leopard diet in Sri Lanka (Mukenhirn & Eisenberg, 1973). In our study the leopards were probably feeding on discarded carcasses of calves as the Rajasthan Forest Department does not have any records of claims for compensation for predation of cattle. The fact that leopards prey on the most easily available


species (themost numerous), has already been demonstrated (Schaller, 1967; Seidensticker, 1983;Kshettry et al. 2018).With a diet dominated by domestic dogs and cats rather than by domestic livestock, the potential economic impact of the leopards of Jhalana Reserve Forest is lower compared to areas where predation of livestock is high and there is a consequent lack of tolerance for such damage (cf. Margulies & Karanth, 2018). In addition a large proportion of the rural population surrounding Jhalana Reserve Forest are Jains, who practise the conservation of biodiversity, and especially of large felids (Athreya et al., 2018); this facilitates human–leopard coexis- tence (Kumbhojkar et al., 2019). Domestic dogs are a public health problem in India and


elsewhere (Reece & Chawla, 2006) and occasionally attack other small domestic animals (Srinivasan, 2013). For people, dog bites can result in infection, disfigurement, incapacity, post-traumatic stress, and even death, and bites from in- fected dogs account for .90% of rabies cases (Seligsohn, 2014; Taylor et al., 2017). Only 2%of the total dog population in the study area are vaccinated (J. Reece, pers. comm., 2019; Reece & Chawla 2006). Dogs could also transfer infectious diseases to leopards. Canine distemper virus is the second most common cause of death in domestic dogs (Deem et al., 2000) and is also responsible for disease outbreaks amongst the African lion Panthera leo in the Serengeti, the Amur tiger Panthera tigris altaica in the Russian Far East and the Asiatic lion in India (Roelke-Parker et al., 1996; Seimon et al., 2013; ICMR, 2018). Leopards that prey substantially on domestic dogs, as do those of Jhalana Reserve Forest, could be considered as suppliers of a service


to the human population amongst whom they thrive, al- though this potentially exposes the leopards to the canine distemper virus.


Acknowledgements We thank Sudharshan Sharma, Deputy Conservator of Forests, for his guidance, the Rajasthan Forest Department for permission to conduct research on the leopards of Jhalana and for collecting scat and biological samples; Pratiksha Vedpathak, Benazir Bagwan, Aseem Shendye and Abhay Shendye from Swasti Agro and Bio-Products Pvt. Ltd. for technical support and assistance with scat analysis; Satish Pande, Satish Karmalkar, Pramod Deshpande, Sanjay Khatavkar and Rajkumar Pawar of Ela Foundation for provision of equipment and laboratory facilities for scat analysis; Rahul Lonkar; Bablu Gurjar, Abhishek Gurjar, Dayal Gurjar, Shubham Saini, Varad Bansod and Hrishikesh Wagh for help with field surveys, scat collection and washing of the scats; G.V. Reddy, Head of Forest Office, Rajasthan Forest Department arranged training at Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Mumbai, for scat analysis; Vidhya Athreya, Nikit Surve and his team of volunteers for training in the field; and Abhinav Mehta for drafting Fig. 1.


Author contributions Study design, fieldwork: SK, RY; data ana- lyses, writing: all authors.


Conflicts of interest None.


Ethical standards This research do not involve handling of animals and otherwise abided by the Oryx guidelines on ethical standards. SK and RY worked under research permit 171 of the Rajasthan Forest Department.


References


ACKERMAN, B.B., LINDZEY, F.G. & HEMKER,T.P. (1984) Cougar food habits in southern Utah. Wildlife Magazine, 48, 147–155.


ANDHERIA, A.P., KARANTH, K.U. & KUMAR, N.S. (2007) Diet and prey profiles of three sympatric large carnivores in Bandipur Tiger Reserve, India. Journal of Zoology, 273, 169–175.


ATHREYA, V.R., THAKUR, S.S., CHAUDHURI,S.&BELSARE, A.V. (2004) Leopards in human-dominated areas: a spillover from sustained translocations into nearby forests. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society, 104, 45–50.


ATHREYA, V.R., THAKUR, S.S., CHAUDHURI,S.&BELSARE, A.V. (2004) A Study of the Man–Leopard Conflict in the Junnar Forest Division, Pune District, Maharashtra. Submitted to the Office of the Chief Wildlife Warden, Maharashtra State Forest Department, and the Wildlife Protection Society of India, New Delhi, India. projectwaghoba.in/docs/junnar_conflict_report_athreya_et_2004_ condensed.pdf [accessed January 2020].


ATHREYA, V., ODDEN, M., LINNELL, J.D.C., KRISHNASWAMY,J.& KARANTH, K.U. (2013) Big cats in our backyards: persistence of large carnivores in a human dominated landscape in India. PLOS ONE, 8,e57872.


ATHREYA, V., ODDEN, M., LINNELL, J.D.C., KRISHNASWAMY,J.& KARANTH, K.U. (2014) A cat among the dogs: leopard Panthera pardus diet in a human-dominated landscape in western Maharashtra, India. Oryx, 50, 156–162.


ATHREYA, V., PIMPAL, S., BORKAR, A.S., SURVE, N., CHAKRAVARTY, S.,GHOSALKA,M. et al. (2018) Monsters or gods? Narratives of large cat worship in western India. CatNews, 67, 23–28.


BISWAS,S.&SANKAR,K. (2002) Prey abundance and food habits of tigers (Panthera tigris tigris) in Pench National Park, Madhya Pradesh, India. Journal of Zoology, 256, 411–420.


Oryx, 2021, 55(5), 692–698 © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605319001145


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164