search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Wildmeat sales 721


FIG. 5 Number of carcasses by species weight category in (a) urban and (b) rural markets (Fig. 1) over 5 and 3 years, respectively. The signs indicate where the observed frequency is significantly more (+) or less (-) than the expected frequency, based on standardized residuals and z-score values.


FIG. 6 Per cent of carcasses in three species categories (pest, non-pest and carnivore) in (a) urban and (b) rural markets (Fig. 1)over 5 and 3 years, respectively. The signs indicate where the observed frequency is significantly more (+) or less (-) than the expected frequency, based on standardized residuals and z-score values.


The number of carcasses in each species weight cate-


gory varied significantly between study years in both Fa- ranah (χ2(8)= 183.833;P,0.001) and the three villages (χ2(4)= 107.093;P,0.001; Fig. 5). Although all weight cat- egories of species were traded as expected in 1994 in Faranah, in 1995 fewer species,10 kg and more species.50 kg were traded than expected. In 1996 similarly significantly fewer species ,10 kg and more species weighing 10–50 kg were traded than expected (Fig. 5a). In 2011 and 2017, however, there was a shift, with significantly more species ,10 kg, fewer species weighing 10–50 kg, and species.50 kg traded as expected (Fig. 5a). In rural areas in 2001 species ,10 kg and .50 kg were traded less than expected, and species weighing 10–50 kg were traded significantly more than ex- pected (Fig. 5b). In 2011 and 2017 small and large species were traded as expected and medium sized species were traded significantly less than expected (Fig. 5b). However, overall, the majority of species were small in 2011 and 2017 in both Faranah and the villages (Fig. 5). There was a significant association in the frequency of


carcasses recorded across years and wildlife categories (non-pest, pest and carnivore) in Faranah (χ2(8)= 76.68, P,0.001) and the rural areas (χ2(4)= 43.388,P,0.001). In Faranah, the carcasses of non-pest species were traded


significantly more than expected in 1994 but significantly less in 2017. The carcasses of pest species comprised 69.5% of all species sold in Faranah in 2017, significantly more than expected (Fig. 6a). Carnivore species were traded in Faranah as expected in 1994, 1995 and 1996 but significantly less than expected in 2011 and 2017 (Fig. 6a). In rural areas, non-pest species were traded significantly more than expected in 2001, and pest species significantly less. However, in 2011 pest species were traded significantly more than expected in villages, and there was no significant difference between observed and expected values in 2017, although these species comprised 52.1% of all recorded carcasses in 2017 (Fig. 6b). No significant differences were noted for carnivore species in rural areas.


Discussion


Our findings reveal that mammalian species comprise the greatest proportion of wildlife traded in the study region, corroborating studies carried out elsewhere in West and Central Africa (Fa et al., 2006). In the urban centre of Faranah, the number of carcasses and offtake of biomass were similar in 1994 and 2017, despite peaks in 1995 and


Oryx, 2021, 55(5), 717–724 © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605319001443


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164