search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NEW FUELS


TECHNICAL


Pathways to decarbonisation


Simplifying new fuel choices for vessel operators is key to managing the transition to a carbon neutral future, writes Georgios Plevrakis, director of global sustainability, ABS.


T


he shipping industry is being challenged daily by the need to improve its environmental performance and reduce its


contribution to climate change. The debate is welcome, but the result is often a welter of competing voices discussing solutions that are still far from commercial availability.


Rather less attention is paid to what owners can do in the shorter term to begin to manage the transition to a carbon neutral future. This confusion is more than theoretical; a situation in which owners weigh their options for the future risks a slowdown in newbuildings.


For cruise operators in particular there is a need to adopt solutions that reduce pollution emissions in the near term as well as seeking ways to manage contribution to climate change over time. This has seen some major operators throw their weight behind LNG as a fuel that can comply with IMO2020 and which can potentially deliver GHG emissions reductions.


ABS has identified three fuel pathways potentially open to shipping, all of which have some applicability to the cruise market:


LNG or light gas


The first can be defined as ‘LNG or light gas’, using generally light, small molecule fuels with high energy content, but more demanding, mainly cryogenic fuel supply


seatrade-cruise.com


systems and storage. This group includes the relatively mature methane (as LNG) solution leading towards bio-derived or synthetic methane, and ultimately to hydrogen as fuel.


LPG/Methanol


The second pathway is defined as ‘LPG/ Methanol’, by using generally heavier, more complex molecules with lower energy content, but with less demanding fuel supply and storage requirements than the light gas pathway. This group includes LPG, methanol and ethanol, leading to bio-derived or synthetic LPG/methanol and ultimately to ammonia.


Bio/synthetic fuels


The third pathway hinges on bio/synthetic fuels that are derived from renewable sources and can produce liquid fuels. These fuels have similar properties to diesel oil and thus are much less demanding in terms of new infrastructure and technologies onboard and can be utilised with minimal changes to current ship designs.


The selection of the most appropriate fuel pathway and related technology is certainly a challenge, which includes considerations of the vessel’s size and design, as well as evaluation of whether lower or higher energy content fuels will best match its operational profile.


For owners considering vessel orders in the next five years, the choice is effectively


By studying future fuels and by considering the degree to which electrical propulsion systems and new energy efficiency technologies will play a role in future, shipowners can best position themselves in the marketplace. Our approach is to simplify this complex problem and enable shipowners to make informed decisions about the fuels and systems that are right for their assets and operation.


At ABS, we see our role as a continuum by supporting the industry in understanding the nature of this challenge. ABS is fuel and technology agnostic; we are working with owners and shipyards to identify the right path for their specific vessels and business case to deliver safe, practical, and simple solutions.


Seatrade Cruise Review 149


between LNG, methanol and LPG since these will provide a pathway to carbon neutral and ultimately zero carbon fuels. By 2030, owners can expect that the options of carbon neutral fuels will be sufficient to provide them with the required blending capacity.


Shipowners can take some steps to future- proof their vessels, starting with designs that assume the greater use of electrical propulsion to reduce the fuel consumption of the vessels. This philosophy assumes that the electricity can be produced from any fuel pathway and can be used for propulsion or power generation onboard, using batteries or fuel cells for full or partial load operation.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228