The Bioanalysis Glossary BIOANALYSIS AUTHOR GUIDELINES
Audience The audience for Newlands Press titles consists of clinicians, research scientists, decision-makers and a range of professionals in the healthcare community.
Submission We accept unsolicited manuscripts. If you are interested in submitting an article, or have any queries regarding article submission, please contact the Editorial Director directly (
l.dormer@
futuremedicine.com). For new article propos- als, the Editorial Director will require a brief article out- line and working title in the first instance. We also have an active commissioning program whereby the Editor, under the advice of the Editorial Advisory Panel, solicits articles directly for publication.
Peer review & revision Once the manuscript has been received in-house, it will be peer-reviewed (usually 4–6 weeks). Following peer review, 2 weeks is allowed for any revisions (suggested by the ref- erees/Editor) to be made.
In-house production Following acceptance of the revised manuscript,
it will
undergo production in-house. Authors will receive proofs of the article to approve before going to print, and will be asked to sign a copyright transfer form (except in cases where this is not possible, i.e., government employees in some countries).
Article types For a more detailed desciption of each article type, please view our author guidelines at:
www.future-science.com
Letters to the Editor Word limit: 1500 Inclusion of Letters to the Editor in the journal is at the discretion of the Editor. All Letters to the Editor will be sent to the author of the original article, who will have 28 days to provide a response to be published alongside the letter.
Conference reports Word limit: 1000–3000 Conference reports aim to summarise the most important research presented at a recent relevant meeting or event. It is not usually feasible to attempt comprehensive coverage of the conference; authors should therefore focus on those presentations that are most topical, interesting or thought-provoking.
Commentaries Word limit: 1500–3000 Commentaries are short articles
that are similar to
Editorials, yet provide a more detailed discussion of a topic. Commentaries should not contain figures or tables. Maximum 20 references.
Original research articles Word limit: varies between research article type. For a more detail description of these, go to www.
future-science.com Four types of research article are accepted: • Primary research article (Word limit: 5000–8000 words) • Preliminary communication (Word limit: 3000–5000 words) • Methodology (Word limit: 3000–5000 words) • Bioanalytical Challenge (Word limit: 2000–3000 words)
Special reports Word limit: 3000–5000 Special reports are short review-style articles that highlight a particular niche area, be it a specific emerging field, novel hypotheses or method. Articles are categorized as Special Reports at the discretion of the Editorial team.
Perspectives Word limit: 4000–8000 Perspectives have the same basic structure and length as review articles; however, they should be more speculative and forward-looking, even visionary. They offer the author the opportunity to present criticism, address controversy or provide a personal angle on a significant issue. Authors of perspectives are encouraged to be opinionated, with all positions concisely and clearly argued and referenced
Regulatory Word limit: 2000–3000 Regulatory articles highlight regulatory issues of importance to bioanalysts, and provide background information, issues and advice for implementing and following the regulations
White papers Word limit: 4000–8000 White Papers are authoritative reports that bring together the opinions and current thinking of leading stakeholders or recognized experts. They may offer recommendations, outline proposals and aim to set out current ‘consensuses’ related to an issue. The issue under discussion should be of immediate importance to the advancement of the field. White Papers will be accepted at the discretion of the Editor.
Reviews Word limit: 4000–8000 words Reviews aim to highlight recent significant advances in research, ongoing challenges and unmet needs; authors should be concise and critical in their appraisal of the sub- ject matter, and strive for clarity. The focus should be on key, defining developments rather than providing a com- prehensive literature survey. Reviews should provide bal- anced coverage of the field and not focus predominantly on the author’s own research. Authors are encouraged to include their own perspective on current trends and future directions.
Bioanalysis Author Guidelines
S126
Bioanalysis (2018) 10(21) Suppl. 1
future science group
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136
