This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
RESEARCH


THE RIGHT DOSE the finishing touch


Two new international studies shed some light on exercise guidelines, highlighting how much physical activity – and at what intensity – is best


C


urrent physical activity guidelines for adults by the World Health Organization recommend 2.5 hours of


moderate exercise – or 1.25 hours of vigorous exercise – a week. But just how frequently you need to work out to achieve optimum health, and how hard, remains unclear. Neither is it clear if there’s an upper limit – how much is too much? Two new studies, both published in the


JAMA Internal Medicine journal in April, reveal some interesting facts.


Exercise frequency In the larger of the two studies*, data on physical activity levels among 661,137 men and women from Europe and the US was collated. They had an average age of 62 and were categorised by the amount of exercise they did each week. The researchers then looked at death rates over a 14-year follow-up period. People who did no exercise faced the


highest risk of mortality. No surprises there. However, even those whose moderate


activity levels fell below the recommended guidelines of 2.5 hours a week – people who were at least doing something – still benefited from exercise. Their risk of dying was reduced by 20 per cent. Longevity increased among those who


met the minimum levels of exercise, or who did twice as much – between 2.5 and 5 hours a week. This group were 31 per cent less likely to pass away. But the optimal results from exercise were seen among the people who engaged in three to five times the recommended amount – equating to 7.5-12.5 hours of leisurely activity a week. They had a 39 per cent lower risk of death.


Research shows that 7.5-12.5 hours of exercise a week is the optimum amount The few who took it to the extreme,


working out 10 times more than the guidelines – or 20.5 hours a week – saw no additional mortality benefit. But neither was there an increased risk of death.


Exercise intensity In another study**, researchers focused on the intensity of exercise and mortality rates over more than six years. It was based on 204,542 men and women in Australia who were aged 45 and older. Participants were categorised not only


by how often they exercised, but also by how hard they pushed themselves. The researchers compared those who engaged in moderate activity – such as a gentle swim, social tennis or household chores – to those who included at least some vigorous activity in their routine, such as jogging, aerobics or competitive tennis. The results showed that achieving the recommended levels of exercise a week


– even if it was just moderate intensity – lowered the risk of premature death. Yet premature death was significantly


lower for those who stepped it up a gear. People who spent up to 30 per cent of their weekly exercise time doing vigorous activity were 9 per cent less likely to die prematurely than those who only opted for more leisurely activities. Meanwhile, those who spent more than 30 per cent of their exercise time working out strenuously saw a 13 per cent reduction in mortality risk. As with the other study, the researchers


found no increased risk of early death when people exercised – even among those who worked out the most frequently and the most vigorously. The take-home message? Any amount


of exercise is good. But 7.5-12.5 hours of physical activity a week reaps the highest benefits in terms of life expectancy. And if up to 30 per cent of that time is spent working out vigorously, even better. l


*Arem H et al. Leisure Time Physical Activity and Mortality: A Detailed Pooled Analysis of the Dose-Response Relationship. JAMA Intern Med, April 2015 **Gebel K et at. Effect of Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity on All-Cause Mortality in Middle-aged and Older Australians. JAMA Intern Med, April 2015


124 spabusiness.com issue 3 2015 ©CYBERTREK 2015


PHOTO: SHUTTERSTOCK/YANLEV


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126