This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
PANEL 4.2 REGIONAL DRIVERS OF MALNUTRITION IN INDONESIA ENDANG ACHADI WITH ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO SUDARNO SUMARTO AND TAUFIK HIDAYAT


I


ndonesia faces a paradox: national gross domestic product (GDP) per capita has grown steadily—from US$1,643 in 2006 to US$3,592 in 2012 (Statistics Indone- sia 2014)—but undernutrition has declined only slowly and obesity and overweight are increasing rapidly. Indonesia is marked by a high degree of geographic, and consequently economic, variation, depending on the district examined. Is this one of the factors driving variation in nutrition outcomes by district? A study by Sumarto et al. (2013) analyzed factors associated with Indonesia’s successful national poverty reduction at the district level in the context of decentralization. The data show that poverty incidence is lower in dis- tricts with higher GDP per capita, higher fiscal revenues as a share of GDP, higher average educational attainment, a larger share of local leaders with secondary education (as a proxy


for local capacity), a higher degree of urban- ization, and local offices for coordinating pov- erty reduction initiatives. We examined the relationship of these


same variables with childhood stunting, a marker of chronic undernutrition, using the Riskesdas National Basic Health Survey (Indonesia, Ministry of Health 2008). Risk- esdas 2007 nutrition data were matched with socioeconomic data for 2005–2010. Our preliminary analysis of 345 districts and municipalities finds results consistent with the Sumarto et al. (2013) study. Stunting prev- alence at the district level is associated with low GDP per capita, a larger share of local leaders with no or low levels of education, and low levels of urbanization.


Another factor in the persistence of the


variation in stunting among districts might be the decentralization of government functions


since 2000. Some have argued that Indonesia implemented decentralization using a radi- cal approach (Hofman and Kaiser 2002) and without a comprehensive policy (World Bank 2005). This may have led to less than optimal shifting of responsibilities and accountabilities from the central to the district level, poten- tially contributing to variations in the quality of nutrition services.


When looking at malnutrition data, it is important to take into account the local con- text: geography, local governance, socioeco- nomic status, demography, and educational attainment. In Indonesia, these dimensions vary strongly by district. Thus, ensuring better planning of health and nutrition programs requires looking deeply at district-level data, not just national data.


identify accountabilities, highlight data gaps, and strategize about action (Panel 4.3). The work so far has highlighted data gaps and incompatibilities, but also the availability of data that had not previously been brought into nutrition analyses.


Equity


As equity has moved up the global development agenda (Haddad 2014), equity gaps in nutrition have increasingly been highlighted (for example, Black et al. 2013). Malnourished children in the poorest income groups may need extra help from public finances given the limited private means they and their families have at their disposal. These children are most likely to face multiple deficits when it comes to intervention coverage and underlying drivers of malnutrition.


Figure 4.1 shows differences in stunting and overweight outcomes by household wealth quintile. Countries with wide disparities in stunting rates between the highest and lowest quintiles are found throughout the range of stunting prev- alences. The wealth disparities in overweight rates are less pronounced but with no obvious pattern to the differences: in many countries the lowest quintile has higher rates of under-five overweight than the highest quintile.


There are large disparities in stunting outcomes by wealth quintile, but as stunting rates decline, are these disparities wid- ening? One of the most comprehensive wealth-based studies is


26 GLOBAL NUTRITION REPORT 2014


a recent analysis of data from 52 countries from the mid-1990s to the mid- to late 2000s (Bredenkamp et al. 2014). The study concludes that for 30 of the 52 countries there is no statistically significant evidence that stunting outcomes are becoming more or less unequal across wealth groups within countries. For 11 countries stunting equity is increasing, and for a different set of 11 countries stunting equity is decreasing (Table 4.4). The au- thors report no obvious relationship between trends in stunting prevalence and trends in stunting inequality.


Equity is not only about wealth. Discrimination can have geographic, historical, and cultural roots that often manifest themselves in different cultural identities. This poses challenges for programming in the presence of different norms, different trust levels, and different ways of influencing behavior. Panel 4.4 draws some lessons from nutrition interventions within US Native American populations, who make up a marginalized group.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118