This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
TABLE A.4 DONOR SPENDING ON NUTRITION-SPECIFIC AND NUTRITION-SENSITIVE CATEGORIES, 2010 AND 2012 (THOUSANDS OF US$) Nutrition-specific


Nutrition-sensitive


Donor Australia Canadaa EUb


France


Germanyc Irelandd


Netherlands Switzerlande


United Kingdom United Statesf


Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation


Children’s


Investment Fund Foundationg


World Bank Total


Source: Authors.


Notes: Green color = increase; orange color = decrease; TBD = to be determined. a


The commitment reflects the total amount reserved for this investment. In order to determine if the amount committed is fully disbursed, disbursements for each year of the investment would need to be reviewed. Because multiple codes are used to classify investments in Canada, a small proportion of the budget for nutrition-sensitive invest- ments may be captured in the nutrition-specific total. As such, these investments would not have been considered for the nutrition-sensitive figures. b


The Nutrition for Growth (N4G) baseline covers EU commitments only. The EU commitments are firm agreements with a partner that entail a particular budget. The reported disbursements of years 2010 and 2012 correspond to the sum of the payments made on the commitments on years 2010 and 2012 only. For humanitarian assistance, com- mitments are disbursed within a period of maximum 24 months. c


The relevant N4G baseline covers the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) commitment only (in thousands of US$): nutrition-spe- cific commitments (2010): US$1,766; and nutrition-sensitive commitments (2010): US$19,104. The totals for Germany do not include humanitarian assistance. d


Ireland operates a cash year, so commitments are equal to disbursements. e


These figures for Switzerland are provisory. They include a significant proportion of nutrition-sensitive investments accounted for under “humanitarian aid” in the Creditor Reporting System of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Development Assistance Committee, such as in-kind provision of Swiss dairy products. f


The development of the US government’s nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive budgets was a collaborative effort and included participation from the US Agency for International Development (USAID), the Millennium Challenge Corporation, and the US Departments of State, Treasury, and Agriculture. Based on nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive definitions consistent with the 2013 Lancet series, departments and agencies analyzed programs to identify resources attributable to nutrition-specific or nutrition-sensitive interventions. For nutrition-specific programming, the following funding streams were considered: USAID Development Assistance; USAID Economic Sup- port Fund; USAID Global Health Programs; USAID Community Development Funding; USAID Food for Peace Title II/Community Development Resilience Fund; USAID Food for Peace Title II/Emergency; USAID International Disaster Assistance; Millennium Challenge Corporation; State Department’s US Global Health Programs (President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief); and Treasury Department’s Global Agriculture and Food Security Program (GAFSP). Departments and agencies also provided descriptions of activities identified as either nutrition-specific or nutrition-sensitive to accompany resource tables. Programs were then further reviewed by technical experts and policymakers to ensure that resources were fully consistent with the definitions. g


54,513 248,171 61,160 21,873 1,928,471 852,750 664,600 925,427 333,521 479,601 5,952,888 5,130,270 1,982,984 1,100,921 937,428 1,112,182 6,617,488 6,055,697 61,160 21,873 1,262,129 1,523,403 2010


Commitments Disbursements 2012


24,075 4,737 1,687 7,565


36,314 12,925 49,960 36,996


50,889 2,895 2,987 7,691 2,661


414,730 339,879 19,540


6,402


39,860 8,820


50,060 980


2010 2012 2010 6,672


16,516


61,280 163,118 98,846 205,463 67,060 3,585 4,550 7,691 4,487


8


3,852 2,719 7,565 4,007


20,762 63,127 49,053


425,917 23,340 19,104 34,806 381


23,976 164,992 23,330 76,948


Commitments 2012


2010


Disbursements 2012


49,903 80,179


543,883 392,563 27,141 37,951 45,412 80,674 43,733


68,380 3,259,518 3,157,153 80,610


18,560 5,481


246,065 302,215 TBD


12,320


23,003 18,856 34,806 2,484


21,099


114,553 90,171


309,209 27,141 29,139 45,412 20,160 28,800


412,737 34,860 2010


Total commitments 2012


110,333 492,977 26,925 23,654 42,497 4,868


23,976 185,754


240,066 567,958 31,878 39,638 52,977


116,988 43,733


258,990


TBD 3,674,248 3,497,032 42,870


68,520 6,402 36,996 Change 2010


Total disbursements 2012


56,575


179,025 443,452 25,898 21,843 42,497 5,145


21,099


342,075 TBD


62,380 980


131,069 295,634 309,217 30,993 31,858 52,977 24,167 28,800


475,864 TBD


115,470 5,481 Change


Both Children’s Investment Fund Foundation commitments and disbursements have been included in terms of contracted (or transferred) amounts for a single year; histori- cally CIFF did not enter into multiyear contracts.


ACTIONS & ACCOUNTABILITY TO ACCELERATE THE WORLD’S PROGRESS ON NUTRITION


85


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118