This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
rates of change in country-level indicators to meet the global target applied at the country level (WHO 2014a). Then we apply rules proposed by WHO (2014a) for determining whether a country is on course to meet the global WHA targets or not (Table 3.3).12


Of the 99 countries that have data on all four WHA indica- tors for which rules exist (stunting, wasting, overweight, and anemia), only one—Colombia—is on course to meet all four targets by 2025, whereas 31 countries are not on course to meet any of the four targets (Figure 3.6).13


Encouragingly, more than two-thirds of all countries that have data on all four indicators will meet at least one goal. African coun- tries represent about 50 percent of the countries in the groups on course to meet zero, one, and two targets. Asian countries repre- sent 42 percent of countries on course to meet 0 targets and about 25 percent of countries on course to meet one or two targets.


Anemia is the indicator for which most countries are finding


it difficult to make progress (Figure 3.7). Mason et al. (2014) argue that addressing anemia urgently requires scaling up effective intervention programs such as supplementation with iron–folic acid or multiple micronutrients, fortification of staple foods or condiments, and disease control measures like malaria control and deworming. They suggest that the lack of attention


to this issue stems from the lack of awareness of its pervasive- ness and its slow rate of progress.


The 5 countries on course for anemia reduction are Burundi, Colombia, Kenya, Vanuatu, and Viet Nam. These 5 countries, with a total population of 192 million, represent 3 percent of the total population of the 185 countries with available data. It is important to learn more about why only these 5 countries are on course for the anemia target.


Wasting is the indicator for which the largest number of


countries are making progress. This result is based not on the average annual rate of reduction, but rather on whether wasting is less than 5 percent (on course) or greater than or equal to 5 percent (off course).14


The 59 countries on course for wasting


reduction include Brazil, China, and the United States. These 59 countries represent 39 percent of all children under age five in the 123 countries with available data.


For stunting reduction, 22 countries are on course, including


China, Turkey, and Viet Nam. These 22 countries represent 23 percent of all children under age five in the 109 countries with available data.


Finally, 31 countries are on course for under-five overweight


reduction out of the 107 with available data. The 31 countries, which include India, Nigeria, and the United States, represent 45


FIGURE 3.2 BASELINE UNDER-FIVE OVERWEIGHT RATE AND ANNUAL REDUCTION IN UNDER-FIVE OVERWEIGHT 30 20 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 5 -40 -50 0 10


OVERWEIGHT AARR (%) BASELINE OVERWEIGHT RATE (%)


25


15


Source: UNICEF, WHO, and World Bank (2014). Note: Years for baseline rates range from 2005 to 2013.


18 GLOBAL NUTRITION REPORT 2014


BASELINE UNDER-FIVE OVERWEIGHT RATE (%)


AVERAGE ANNUAL RATE OF REDUCTION (AARR) IN UNDER-FIVE OVERWEIGHT (%)


Papua New Guinea Benin


Indonesia Azerbaijan Egypt


Kazakhstan Sierra Leone Mali


Tunisia Nepal


Philippines Burundi Iraq


Maldives Bangladesh Viet Nam Niger


Thailand Honduras Namibia


United Rep. of Tanzania Bhutan


Montenegro


Sao Tome and Principe Burkina Faso Uzbekistan Suriname Mexico Gabon Guyana China


The FYR Macedonia Venezuela Eritrea


Mongolia Mozambique Haiti


Pakistan Georgia Botswana Kuwait


Dominican Republic Myanmar Jordan Ghana Oman


Bosnia and Herzegovina Armenia Timor-Leste Rwanda Chad


El Salvador Tajikistan Djibouti Colombia Bolivia


Syrian Arab Rep. United States Liberia Ethiopia Chile Guinea Jamaica Uganda DRC


Morocco Uruguay Algeria Albania Kyrgyzstan Malawi Lao PDR Peru


Equatorial Guinea Nicaragua Swaziland Zambia Sri Lanka Guatemala Serbia Gambia Cameroon Kenya


Comoros India


Guinea-Bissau Mauritania Cambodia Nigeria Senegal Zimbabwe Belize Lesotho


Côte d'Ivoire Congo


South Sudan Yemen


Central African Republic Togo


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118