This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Of particular concern is nutrition’s low profile in the current SDG framing. There are a total 169 draft targets: 109 on what to achieve and 60 on how to achieve them. Only 1 of 109 draft “what” targets is directly related to malnutrition:


Target 2.2 by 2030 end all forms of malnutrition, including achieving by 2025 the internationally agreed targets on stunting and wasting in children under five years of age, and address the nutritional needs of ado- lescent girls, pregnant and lactating women, and older persons (Open Working Group on Sustainable Develop- ment Goals 2014)


None of the 60 “how” targets relate directly to nutrition.


The broad nature of target 2.2 suggests that the nutrition com- munity must become more engaged in the post-2015 process to position nutrition thoughtfully and strategically in the post-2015 development accountability framework. At a minimum, govern- ment and civil society nutrition champions should work together to embed not only targets related to stunting and wasting, but all six internationally agreed WHA targets within the 169 targets (see Table 2.3).


How would these additional targets fit into the SDG targets? First, the language in SDG target 2.2 suggests there is space


for more targets within it. Second, a better approach may be to work with allies to embed nutrition indicators in other goals and targets (Haddad 2013). Both approaches should be explored. Table 2.4 gives examples of proposed SDG targets in which additional nutrition targets could be embedded, and these rep- resent areas in which nutrition champions should intensify their engagement and advocacy.


TIMEFRAMES FOR IMPROVING NUTRITION SHOULD BE MORE AMBITIOUS


SDG target 2.2 also needs more specifics on time-bound targets beyond “by 2030 end all forms of malnutrition.” These SDG targets in general have been critiqued as being so unrealistic as to render them meaningless for accountability purposes and a poor guide to action (Horton 2014). But what are realistic time- frames for improving nutrition?


As noted, in 2012 the World Health Organization (WHO) member states endorsed the six WHA global targets for improv- ing maternal, infant, and young child nutrition by 2025 (WHO 2014a). The rationale for the selection of these six indicators, and the setting of the targets for them, is outlined in de Onis et al. (2013).2


Chapter 3 will show that the world is not on course to meet any of the six WHA goals. Given this lack of progress,


FIGURE 2.1 BENEFIT-COST RATIOS OF SCALING UP NUTRITION-SPECIFIC INTERVENTIONS FOR STUNTING REDUCTION IN SELECTED COUNTRIES 56 53 48 44 34 29 27 23 18 16 13 13 6 4 15 12 19 17 13 11 6 11 9 11 10 7 12 19 20 16 10 17 14 18 13 13 25 31 28 36


Source: Hoddinott et al. (2013), and additional country estimates made by the authors based on the methodology in Hoddinott et al. (2013). Note: The benefit-cost ratios are for scaling up the nutrition-specific interventions described in Bhutta et al. (2013a).


ACTIONS & ACCOUNTABILITY TO ACCELERATE THE WORLD’S PROGRESS ON NUTRITION 9


Bangladesh India


Nepal Pakistan


Sri Lanka Benin


Burkina Faso Burundi


Cameroon Chad


Côte d'Ivoire DRC


Ethiopia Ghana


Guinea Kenya Liberia


Madagascar Malawi Mali


Mozambique Niger


Nigeria


Rwanda Senegal


Sierra Leone South Africa Sudan


United Rep. of Tanzania Togo


Uganda Zambia Egypt


Myanmar Indonesia Lao PDR


Philippines Viet Nam Yemen Haiti


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118