This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Chasing Car Tax


The provision of an employer provided car (often referred to as a company car) is still valued by recipient employees and directors. However, the increasing tax and national insurance costs to the employee and employer respectively have driven employers to consider alternative arrangements to provide cars to their employees.


In a recent case a company entered into leasing agreements with its employees. The employees paid a market rate rent for the exclusive use of the car. The company also reimbursed employees for business mileage travelled at the standard HMRC rates for employees who use their own car for business purposes.


HMRC argued that even though market rate rents were being paid by the employees, the arrangements still gave rise to a taxable benefi t as the car essentially being provided by the employer.


If this was the position PC & Laptop repair


and maintenance No fi x, No fee!


Collection and drop off service. £25.00 set charge, plus parts as required.


Please contact Paul 07904 369 509


paulkerr1974@yahoo.com


then the mileage rates paid would also be considered excessive with a resulting tax charge to the employees.


the acceptable tax free mileage rate for an employer provided car is much lower than the standard rates for an employee owned car.


The company appealed to the First Tier Tribunal on a number of grounds. Firstly, they argued that the car benefi t charge can only apply if a car is made available to an employee, without any transfer of the property in it. The Tribunal agreed that as a result of the lease agreements there was a transfer of the property in the cars to the employees. Secondly, the car benefi t charge can only apply if there is an actual benefi t provided to an employee. As the employees were paying market rate rents for the cars there was no benefi t provided to the employees. Tribunal agreed with these arguments.


The


As regards the contention that the mileage rates were too high as the cars were company cars, the Tribunal did not agree with HMRC as the cars were not company cars. As a result the Tribunal allowed the taxpayers’ claims for relief from tax for the mileage allowance payments.


The key tax decisions made in this case are being appealed by HMRC to the Upper Tribunal so whilst the fi rst round has gone to the taxpayers the fi ght is not yet decided.


Kindly provided by The A9 Partnership 01786 822 066


32 To advertise in thewire t. 07720 429 613 e. the.wire@btinternet.com


This is because


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80