This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
manager Rob Smith decided to take out a free trial of the Echo Barrier H2 noise reduction barriers.


The results were so successful the company made a bulk purchase of Echo Barriers to use on other similar projects.


Smith said of the barriers: “We applied the Echo Barrier product and saw significant noise reduction within this area. As well as the works team, our environmental manager was also impressed with the noise reduction and the reduced impact on local residents – hence the purchase.”


Reducing disruption


The Murphy Group also now routinely specifies noise control measures for construction projects, and says it has become an imperative component in their work for ‘sound’ commercial reasons. Paul Mallorie from The Murphy Group said: “We use noise reduction barriers because want to ensure we remain ahead of the game at all times. This technology enables us to work later and longer whilst reducing any disruption to neighbouring communities.”


Noise reduction experts Echo Barrier have seen the impact of increased specifier activity – both here in the UK, and overseas.


Our patented, high-tech barriers were first launched back in 2010 and have continued to be developed at a rapid pace since. When we first entered the market, it was a case of having to spell out the benefits in precise detail. These days, we seem


to be preaching more to the converted because contractors really do get the benefits to their business – both commercially and in terms of the all important ‘reputational management’.


Operational costs


Of course, most will think about cost first. Putting acoustic attenuation measures in place often makes commercial sense simply by helping to reduce project schedules through the extension of potential working hours.


Operational costs are clearly a key consideration for every contractor, but where these can be minimised by reducing project duration, you create a win-win situation for all parties; reduced costs for the contractor and reduced disturbance to local residents.


It stands to reason that if we can help make a construction site quieter, we’re potentially enabling a construction team to work a little later into the day, and thus reduce the overall number of days they’re committed to a site.


And that’s before you start talking about the potential savings in hassles and management time through reducing or eliminating noise complaints from the public, not to mention the occupational health benefits in respect to your own staff.


Some of these factors may seem rather trivial in isolation, but put them together and they can have a major consequence on how well a project runs, how it’s perceived by the public and regulators,


and even on how likely a company is to be hired again in the future.


Contractual requirements on the horizon?


While currently there is no absolute legal imperative to enforce the use of sound attenuation measures, experiences like those of Costain-Skanska and The Murphy Group suggest that this element may soon become a contractual requirement as part of current best practice. We believe those days really aren’t too far away.


As time goes on we’re continually hearing about the health impacts that have been caused to industrial employees due to the working practices of previous generations, and I personally believe hearing issues are something we should be addressing now to protect those who work in the world of construction into the future.


Add that to the fact that we’re expecting the public to comment and to campaign as a matter of course these days, I think it stands to reason that this will become a regulatory requirement.


In the meantime however, it remains for each and every contractor to ask themselves: could introducing noise control measures be a key factor in the perception of a successful project site, and could it even bring me more work in the future?


Echo Barriers have been used on rail projects across the globe, including on the Rail Link project in Victoria, Australia, as well as at projects relating to London’s Underground network, including the upgrade to Tottenham Court Road London Underground station on behalf of Vinci/ BAN Nuttall.


FOR MORE INFORMATION


0208 408 7107 www.echobarrier.co.uk


rail technology magazine Apr/May 14 | 87


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208