SKILLS & TRAINING
signal engineers, business processes, training courses, and the IRSE licensing scheme itself.
The international dimension proved something of a damp squib for those who blame the lure of Australia and the Far East for the lack of UK signal engineers: the evidence suggests that the net effect is minimal, as international workers also come to the UK seeking work, and international companies try to use their global talent pools in the most efficient ways.
Clark said: “My key message to the industry on this is that while it’s not a major contributor to the ‘gap’, based on our analysis, we do have to recognise that we live in a global marketplace. Talent will move – both ways. As an industry, we need to take advantage of that two-way street, not just bemoan the fact that people sometimes leave the UK.”
New blood
NSARE approached the 40 or so companies who provide signal engineering resources in the UK, most of whom engaged with the study. About half had an apprenticeship scheme, though only a few took on more than one or two people a year. Coupled with Network Rail, which takes on 50-60 maintenance-focused signal engineering apprentices a year, the total number roughly balances the number of people retiring – but it doesn’t allow for the growth that’s coming over the next few years.
Douglas McCormick, managing director of Atkins Rail UK
roles more generally. But the best estimate is that there about 140 a year joining the railway. Business processes was a key issue for many of the companies and engineers interviewed and surveyed by NSARE. Many of them are concerned at the high level of re-work at projects’ design stage, up to 30%. That figure is consistent with feedback received by RIA, the Railway Industry Association, representing the supply chain.
Clark said: “That’s a huge amount of wasted effort, which is costing money and effectively taking designers away from other work. There can also be a lack of visibility of upcoming work, which would allow for more detailed planning. We need to improve business processes as an industry to eliminate some of that.”
Training courses vary in quality and content, and are less standardised than many employers assume. There is no nationally accepted set of standards, and accreditation is currently voluntary. The study steering group is to consider whether formally accrediting training provision for signal engineering through NSARE’s established processes is the best way forward.
Finally, the IRSE licensing scheme has “served the industry well for the last 20 years”, Clark said – but it is high time to examine how it can best serve the industry for the next 20 years. The industry likes the scheme’s rigour and independence, but as roles change, it is widely felt it could do with being more flexible.
Clark said: “The industry is especially looking to get more flexibility across designer-testers, and some other categories, so people aren’t having to re-do the same assessments and the same knowledge blocks several times. This doesn’t mean making it easier – it means making it more flexible. There is also a desire to streamline some assessment processes, and incorporate more consistency.”
The IRSE has set up a working group to look at these good practical proposals to take them forward. Clark said the IRSE has been an “integral member” of the steering group, and chief executive Colin Porter spoke at the seminar.
Feedback
The industry has welcomed the study, which will be presented in its final form to Network Rail by the summer, and its key findings are expected to be shared more widely after that.
Graduate numbers are harder to quantify, because they are often not specific to signal engineering when they first enter the industry, but instead work across electrical engineering
Rather than coming as a big shock, the findings mostly seem to quantify and clarify what companies and clients already knew or expected. But they are grateful that there now exists a sophisticated model
Colin Porter, chief executive, IRSE
for signal engineering resource forecasting and monitoring, which can be refined as time goes on.
Mark Southwell himself spoke at the seminar day on 27 March, and stayed for the full day to answer questions, of which there were many.
He told RTM later: “This is a hugely important piece of work which will help the rail industry understand the demand for signalling resource across the network and how it can supply and manage that resource.
“The industry now has a good baseline of data which needs to be maintained so we can monitor the situation and take action where appropriate. We recognise this is a challenge for the entire industry and we need to work together in a cohesive group to deliver the most benefit.
“It’s clear we must attract new people into the industry through conversion courses and apprenticeships in order to increase the supply of signalling expertise. There are already many good examples of Network Rail and suppliers doing exactly this, but we need to ensure we develop this capability further.”
There was a follow-up steering group meeting on 24 April to decide how to take the recommendations forward. RTM will report on progress in future editions.
FOR MORE INFORMATION
www.nsare.org
rail technology magazine Apr/May 14 | 39
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208