This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
ROLLING STOCK


Automatic transmission


South West Trains is piloting a fuel saving measure for its Class 158 Sprinters when operating at low speeds. RTM talked to Christian Roth, fleet director for the South West Trains – Network Rail Alliance.


T


he Class 158/159 is a common sight across the UK rail network, in passenger service with seven different TOCs.


The trains, built from 1989-1992 at BREL’s Derby Works, feature a Voith T211rz or T211rzz hydraulic transmission (and Gmeinder GM 190 final drive), but a modern mechanical gearbox is thought to offer better fuel economy on some routes, especially those with lots of stops.


Porterbrook, which owns a large number of the trains,


has previously suggested that


replacing the transmission with ZF technology would save “up to 10%” on fuel costs, with the only downside being more frequent maintenance overhauls, and the complexity of integrating the technology into trains more than 20 years old.


A trial is now underway on one of the South West Trains – Network Rail Alliance 158s which suggests that fuel savings will in fact be even higher than 10%.


The six to eight month trial, due to finish around July, shows savings “definitely above the 10% mark”, according to fleet director Christian Roth.


The operator has long been keen on using newer technology to cut fuel costs – RTM has previously covered its regenerative braking, train metering and variable stiffness bush (on the Desiros) projects.


Roth told us that alongside the carbon footprint benefits, there are real business and profitability benefits, especially with energy prices likely to go on rising.


He said the energy consumption on the train using the ZF mechanical gearbox (the Ecomat,


as used on the Class 172s) depends on line of route, stopping pattern, and a number of other factors, but that the signs are all good.


He said: “It is technically complex to replace the existing hydrostatic gearbox design with a mechanical design. There are investment costs to do that kind of change on a piece of rolling stock.”


He hopes to use this trial to establish a business case with Porterbrook, because in a couple of years the old transmissions will have to be overhauled anyway. Offsetting investment costs in a replacement against those overhaul costs and the energy savings of a new transmission will make the business case easier to establish.


He called the Voith transmissions “the principle design of that time” – it’s the standard design for rail applications in the lower and middle performance range of rolling stock, used across Europe, he said. Higher performance diesels – HSTs and diesel locomotives, for example – usually have a generator and electrical traction motors instead.


But the ZF design is derived from HGV-type applications, he said, and made suitable for railway applications. “Automatic transmission and the associated power range and technology were not available when the 158s/159s were designed originally.”


The automatic transmission has five distinct gear ratios, so the fuel losses within the transmission at lower speeds are dramatically reduced.


Two of the transmissions are fitted under unit 158885 as part of the trial, which is gathering fuel efficiency data to be compared to another unmodified unit on the same


diagrams and stopping patterns.


Roth said: “The basic results can be used for any kind of Sprinter or Super Sprinter or Turbostar. However, the specific amount of saving in terms of the percentage of fuel depends on the duty cycle of the rolling stock and the train service.


“Once our pilot is finished, we’ll know whether there’s a case to develop this further for other areas.


“The activity we are doing is very joined up with Porterbrook as the owner. There is sharing of information among the ROSCOs, the others are definitely aware.


“By July time, we’ll have a robust set of results regarding the fuel saving, and together with Porterbrook we’ll develop the business in autumn to make a decision on whether we go into fleet fitment or can’t make it work.


“It’s definitely encouraging, what we’ve seen so far. There is technical complexity – it’s not an easy project. But we’ve overcome a number of challenges already, so it’s looking quite promising.”


Vossloh Kiepe UK was commissioned by Porterbrook to test the feasibility of the retrofit in August 2012. Vossloh Kiepe UK’s engineering director Hugh Parker said at the time: “This trial is incredibly important to the industry as we have a legacy of regional diesel trains which will stay in service for some time to come.”


Christian Roth


TELL US WHAT YOU THINK opinion@railtechnologymagazine.com


rail technology magazine Apr/May 14 | 63


© Steve Hughes


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208