This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
rifle back to me. That old rifle is now in its permanent home. We have been together for almost 45 years. In recent years, my work has


involved me in a lot of reloading and testing, some of which has been done with the old Remington 700. Even though I now have other rifles that are superb varmint rifles, the 222 is still my favorite. In terms of performance, it is close enough to the 223 Remington that I feel no need to try to achieve about 25 yards of additional range. Reloading data for the 222 is


voluminous indeed. However, as in the case of any cartridge, no manual lists all the available bullets, powders, cases, and primers available. When new propellants become available, re- loading manuals may not report data for them for a few years. Neither are all data obtained in the same type of firearm. The result is that I, like many others, experiment with different loads in an effort to determine how my rifle performs. But is it all necessary? In an interesting article, “Reload-


ing Facts & Myths: What Really Helps” by Ritchie Moorhead (The Varmint Hunter Magazine®, 2012 No. 83, p. 18) many facets of reloading are discussed. The effects of sorting bullets, making flash holes uniform, sorting cases, and so on are systematically examined. However, Mr. Moorhead makes the statement, “On average, we can do extremely well with factory loads in the varmint cartridges.” That got me to thinking about how much time and effort I spend reloading for my 222


We are YOUR Nightforce Dealer!


Contact us for additional information


Also Stocking Optics By: Leupold


Michi-GUN


Swarovski Zeiss


www.michigunandtackle.com


31516 Harper Avenue St. Clair Shores, MI 48082 Phone: (586) 296-2360 Fax: (586) 264-8307


Remington. Is it necessary? Not having fired a factory car-


tridge through the 222 for quite a few years, I found that I did not even have any factory ammo on hand. So, I pro- ceeded to obtain several of the most popular factory loads. One thing I found quickly was that there has been a quiet revolution in factory ammuni- tion, even for some of the “old time” cartridges such as the 222. Factory am- munition is available in the traditional soft point, but there also are a few types that feature polymer tipped bullets. I also found that some of the modern “super” loads were touted as producing significantly higher velocity than the


Redfield, Nikon Vortex


Trijicon and Counter Sniper


3,140 ft/sec of the original factory load. The factory ammunition was


tested in my Remington 700ADL with a Cabela’s Alaskan Guide 6-20x AO scope attached. Although I use that scope for testing, the rifle normally wears a Leupold Vari-X II 3-9x, which to me seems about right for a rifle in 222 Remington caliber. I fired the rifle supported on sandbags with the Competition Electronics ProChrono chronograph 10 feet from the muzzle. The velocities recorded were not cor- rected to be muzzle velocities. The testing was done at an out-


door range on the side of one of the foothills of the Big Horn Mountains.


This 0.44-inch group was produced by the Fiocchi V-Max load.


Horizontal stringing as shown by this group is the result of a crosswind operating on the small bullet.


www.varminthunter.org Page 95


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196