This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
The Frangible


Advantage Mic McPherson


Cross-sections of selected 22-caliber varminting bullets. Left to right: Berger 30 VHP, 40 VHP, and 50 VHP; Nosler 40 BT; Sierra 40 BlitzKing; Hornady 40 V-Max and 60 V-Max; Barnes 36 Varmint Grenade (VG); Hornady 35 NTX; Nosler 35 BTLF. I discussed basic characteristics of most of these in the text. Worth noting is that core of the VG is a solid copper-based composite; core of the NTX seems to be a very similar material; main core of BTLF is compressed copper shot, which has essentially zero airspace, with a plastic cap interposing ballistic tip and main core (many core particles have fallen out, which is useful to demonstrate core design, where these have not fallen out it is easy to see how little core-void exists). Notice significant solid base on BT. This is why these bullets tend to be more effective against larger species of vermin. This also is why it is so easy to develop accuracy loads with these bullets (solid base is significantly less apt to asymmetrically deform as bullet transitions from case to rifling. Relatively hard and resilient cores of frangible bullets should offer the same advantage). (Epoxy used to fix bullets infiltrated tips of hollow-point bullets to varying degrees – visible as darkened area inside mouth of these bullets.)


SYNOPSIS:


Frangible varminting bullets have the obvious advantage of limiting rico- chet hazard. But, for varmint hunters, these bullets have other significant ad- vantages. Among those are increased ef- fective range, reduced recoil, and, often, a usefully flatter trajectory. Here I will address these in some detail. A DISCLAIMER


The more sophisticated the de- sign, the more opportunity for unan- ticipated variations to negatively affect performance. A plastic-tipped bullet is more sophisticated than a conventional hollow-point bullet is and a frangible core bullet is far more sophisticated yet. Rather than discussing all the variables that might possibly defeat the function of a frangible bullet, I will offer an ex- ample from a different era. Many decades ago, Speer invented primer-powered ammunition intended for safe indoor target practice with a rudimentary bullet trap. This product worked very well. About the same time, Speer intro-


Page 40 Winter 2013


duced shot cups for use in pistol and revolver cartridges. During in-house design evaluation, these worked won- derfully in everything they tested. Wide velocity variations in the load and wide burn rate variations in the propellant used and wide shot size variations did not seem to matter. The things just worked as intended – excellent snake and small pest killers out to about 15 feet, at least. So, for marketing, Speer came up with a color scheme to designate shot- cup caliber and to make the product a bit sexier – it is well proven that we all respond to colors better than we do to plain transparency. Speer produced millions of the


things in various calibers and filled the product pipeline so retailers across the country could stock this useful new item. A minor disaster ensued. When handloaders tried these in-


teresting new devices, the cups for some calibers would not disintegrate at all. Other sizes were problematic – worked sometimes with some loads.


The problem was that addition of


parts-per-million of the dyes added to the plastic changed the characteristics of the plastic so radically that many colors were so tough that those acted as a bul- let, rather than as a frangible jacket that shattered in the barrel and disintegrated upon barrel exit.


Nobody in the plastics industry


predicted this. Speer had to find it out the expensive way. Frangible bullets suffer the same


potential sensitivity to material qual- ity and composition. The following discussion ignores this aspect and in it I assume that the related manufactur- ers have the quality-control issues well in hand and that their quality-control personnel continue to do so. Keeping in mind that any manufacturer can have quality-control problems and that at least one of the majors has developed something of a reputation for releasing products that do not work (at least not in the initial incarnation), the following discussion assumes best feasible design and quality for desired performance.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196