search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Feature


I f we want managers to coach their team members, then they need support, guidance and tools to assist them . . . and they need role models – from above and amongst their peers


Many of us hear about this ‘coaching


culture’. Fewhave been lucky enough to actually encounter one. And when we do… Chief eole ffi cers will tell us that line managers are expected to coach their team members. Team members tell us they cannot remember having been coached. Line managers tell us they think coaching is someone else’s job. This is the coaching conundrum writ


large. While many think it is a good idea, few have actually created the environment where even the most basic coaching activities routinely occur. So, let’s assume for the moment that the organisation tells managers to coach. Let’s assume these exhortations are insuffi cient to effect an kind of change.


When I talk to those expected to coach about why they don’t, there are four reasons I uncover most frequently:


1. I don’t have time. We all have 168 hours per week and some team leaders will be making time to support staff as they try new things, apply new skills they’ve learned (which may even have involved a course!) or pursue their ambitions for advancement. If this is happening in some teams, then, the issue is not time but prioritisation. Is coaching routinely put aside until this or that other thing is dealt with, or the latest crisis averted? Many managers have been promoted


from within and may retain some operational responsibilities. This


represents safe ground for the manager and – let’s face it: “it’s quicker to do the job myself than teach a novice to do it half as well in twice the time, amirite?” Some team leaders have surprisingly little autonomy over how they spend their working hours. Demands from on high increase exponentially; data requests are neer ending fi refi ghting reduces good intentions to smoking rubble. The simple fact is that supporting team members to build their capability to meet organisation goals does take time, yet few have factored this into how they hire, how they promote and how they manage team leaders. he are not an infi nitel stretchable resource. (And if I hear a senior manager say “We need our team leaders to work smarter, not harder” once more, I may not be responsible for my actions.)


2. Fear. Even where the need is for managers to coach their teams in core capabilities, and that manager has been promoted from within, they may be disconnected from the coalface. The special projects, the reports, the meetings, the new technology… is it any wonder managers may feel they are a it rust? ot uite as confi dent to act as a role model for those day-to-day


>


Special Edition | 7


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76