search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
human Deliberately


For the learning and development sector, the proliferation of AI across the workplace means people professionals need to step up as never before – and not in the way that you may think, says Emma Weber


T


he world of Learning and Development right now is – well – a lot. If you’re inL&D, it’s likely you joined this


profession because you understood something about people. How they learn, how they resist, how they grow. And now the thing you’re being asked to solve isn’t a training gap or a leadership programme, it’s what work looks like when the machines can do so much of it. Even the people who live and breathe AI every day will tell you they feel like they’re being left behind. That’s not comfortable, but it’s honest. The data is starting to tell us


something we can’t ignore. An Australian Government Copilot report* found that when AI tools were rolled out at scale, the barrier wasn’t the technology. It was the human. This is the call – not to become technologists, but to recognise that


52 | learnevents.com


the profession that understands people is being asked to step up in a way we haven’t been before. And here’s the reframe we need:


what’s changed is not people. What’s changed is the context. The humans inside our organisations are still the same humans we’ve spent our careers learning about. We know about behaviour change. We know about resistance. We know that telling people to “just adopt” something never works. Being human is what will matter most as we move through this transition - not A  uenc though thats imortant  but how well we attend to the human experience of all this change. That means looking inward before we look outward. We instinctively reach for certainty from the outside – from leaders, from frameworks, from the next conference keynote that promises to hae it all fi gured out. ut in the age of AI, what’s needed is something quieter: the wisdom to slow down when


everything around us is accelerating, and the courage to sit with uncertainty long enough to make good decisions. Intelligence is increasingly on tap. What humans bring is judgement – and judgement needs space. Space is also what’s needed for the


emotional journey that’s happening with AI, which is one that rarely gets talked about, and is the thing


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76