search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
STERILE SERVICES


Lessons learned in decontamination


The Central Sterilising Club Autumn Study Day 2018 provided an excellent learning opportunity for all those involved in decontamination – from hands-on operatives, decontamination managers, infection prevention practitioners and associated professionals to extend their knowledge and improve practice.


Taking place on 17 September 2018 at the striking Birmingham Botanical Gardens, delegates were welcomed by Val O’Brien, CSC Chair, who provided an overview of this year’s theme “What could possibly go wrong?” The first session, chaired by Gill Ellis-Pow, examined whether surgical instruments can always be considered fit for purpose. Sharon Fox, Trust decontamination and sterile service manager, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, described a case in which black particles were discovered on a number of refurbished trays.


Theatre staff had reported high levels of


particles which were only visible when lifting instrumentation and metallurgy tests were performed, enabling the samples to be sent to Birmingham University. The majority revealed traces of FE (iron) and SI (Silica). Sharon Fox produced a VCI Laminectomy – Cause & Effect diagram, which showed the process flow and revealed what the main problems were. “All the laminectomy trays had problems,” she explained. “The refurbishment of the trays was what caused the black particles, and so all newly refurbished trays are now pre-treated in ultrasonic and processed three times through the washer disinfector. This seems to have worked.” Citing another case, Sharon described an incident in an ophthalmic theatre where particles were discovered in a patient’s eye, following a small incision in the eye to remove a cataract. “In December 2014, plastic particles were found in a patient’s eye,” she said. “However, when a second incident occurred later that month, all trays were removed from circulation and reprocessed. “During this time, all SOPs,


manufacturers and maintenance procedures were reviewed, but then a third incident occurred and surgery was suspended. “Theatres weren’t holding stock as per manufacturers’ guidelines, so we looked at training, used another lab and the result was the IA Tip. The IA tip was fitted to the IAP, but


NOVEMBER 2018


It’s vital that you admit any areas of knowledge where you need to find advice yourself, and to use institute supported CPD


activities. Graham Stanton, IHEEM AE(D) Registration Board


when theatre staff removed the plastic sheath, it shed plastic particles and into the patients’ eyes. We reviewed training – and this is ongoing. We also improved SOP within theatres; reviewed lumen thermal disinfections and reported the data to the MHRA.” Graham Stanton, retired senior decontamination engineer, Shared Services, and currently chair of IHEEM AE(D) Registration Board, took to the stage to discuss difficult situations that involved the AE(D) to try and resolve.


“What do you expect from your AE(D)?” he asked. “It is a complex role that requires a good effective team working with other health professionals and this is essential to be effective for patient safety with regards to decontamination.”


Sharing his experience in situations WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM I 53


t


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88