search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
COMMENT CSJ THE CLINICAL SERVICES JOURNAL Editor


Chris Shaw chrisshaw@stepcomms.com


Technical Editor Kate Woodhead


Business Manager Dean Walford deanwalford@stepcomms.com


Sales Executive


Rob Cornish robcornish@stepcomms.com


Journal Administration Katy Cockle katycockle@stepcomms.com


Design Steven Dillon


Publisher


Geoff King geoffking@stepcomms.com


Publishing Director Trevor Moon trevormoon@stepcomms.com


THE CLINICAL SERVICES JOURNAL is published in January, February, March, April, May, June, August, September, October and November by Step Communications Ltd, Step House, North Farm Road, Tunbridge Wells, Kent TN2 3DR, UK.


Tel: +44 (0)1892 779999 Fax: +44 (0)1892 616177 Email: csj@stepcomms.com Web: www.clinicalservicesjournal.com


Should managers take a back seat ?


Managers need to be a ‘back seat driver’ and share leadership if much-needed and promising innovations are going to spread across the NHS, new research suggests. Billions of pounds are spent annually on R&D in the NHS - the National Institute for Health Research has an annual budget of £1 billion alone - and yet spreading innovations across hospital Trusts is notoriously problematic and poor.


Graeme Currie and Dimitrios Spyridonidis,


of Warwick Business School, followed the progress of 12 innovations as they were attempted to be spread across Trusts over a three year period, which encompassed 210 interviews and 56 hours of observation. They found one innovation dealing with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) to be the stand out performer as it successfully spread to 15 other healthcare providers, while others, they say, went nowhere. Professor Currie said: “It was a workforce


© 2018 Step Communications Ltd Single copy: £19.00 per issue. Annual journal subscription: UK £114.00 Overseas: £150.00


ISSN NO. 1478-5641


The Publisher is unable to take any responsibility for views expressed by contributors. Editorial views are not necessarily shared by the journal. Readers are expressly advised that while the contents of this publication are believed to be accurate, correct and complete, no reliance should be placed upon its contents as being applicable to any particular circumstances.


This publication is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention. All rights reserved, apart from any copying under the UK Copyright Act 1956, part 1, section 7. Multiple copies of the contents of the publication without permission is always illegal.


innovation, where a team combining nurses, community nurses, and doctors was put together and through a programme of care, education around lifestyle and monitoring they were able to keep long-term sufferers of respiratory conditions under control and out of A&E and so saving the Trusts thousands of pounds, while improving patients’ health. “There were other great innovations we looked at involving HIV care, diabetes and more, but they did not spread as successfully as this COPD innovation. That was because they did not have the same shared leadership model as the COPD innovation, either managers put too much pressure on doctors with performance or financial targets, or those innovations initiated by doctors simply ran out of money. Prof Currie noted that this COPD innovation saw managers, nurses and doctors working in concert: “Managers gave the mandate to innovate and provide the resource, but were then like a back seat driver. They understood doctors have the power and expert knowledge, while nurses deliver the care so understand the operational context.” According to Dr Spyridonidis, this shared leadership model with innovation could be used as a blueprint across the NHS in getting evidence-based innovations actually into practice across the whole healthcare system.


NOVEMBER 2018


“There is plenty of innovation going on in the NHS, the big problem is diffusing it and that is an organisational and management problem,” he said. “This shared leadership model provides an answer.” At the hospital in North West London studied, managers outlined the problem with COPD and called for bids for a pot of money to work on solutions. The winning bid from a group of doctors was then given a trial and evaluation period. It saw managers then taking a back seat as doctors worked with nurses in the hospital and community in putting a package of care together.


There is plenty of innovation going on in the NHS, the big problem is diffusing it and that is an organisational and management problem


To help it spread to other hospitals in the region managers put in structures and organised meetings for doctors to meet with commissioners and peers to reveal evidence of the successful innovation. Prof Currie added: “The configuration of shared leadership was one in which doctors were pre-eminent influencers of innovation diffusion, nurses had enhanced their leadership influence through engagement and adaption activity, and managers had ceded leadership to doctors albeit the former continued to influence innovation diffusion in the background.” Prof Currie believes it is a template that should be adopted more widely to get innovations properly diffused.


Chris Shaw l Editor chrisshaw@stepcomms.com


Join the CSJ LinkedIn group Search for ‘Clinical Services Journal’


Follow us on twitter: @csjmagazine


WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM I 5


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88