search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PATIENT SAFETY


Post-decannulation wound dressing first


A revolutionary post-decannulation tracheostomy wound dressing, developed by three UK clinicians, is improving patient control, enhancing voice quality and reducing the need for dressing re-application.


Clinicians from Addenbrooke’s Hospital, which is part of the Cambridge University Hospitals (CUH) NHS Foundation Trust, developed a ground-breaking dressing after being unhappy there were no specifically designed dressings for post-decannulation tracheostomy wounds. With the support of Bristol-based medical device company P3 Medical and the Health Enterprise East (HEE), they were able to commercialise their idea and create a product that is now helping thousands of people across the UK and beyond. The Clinical Services Journal spoke to one of the clinical developers, tracheostomy nurse consultant, Claudia Russell, to find out where the idea came from and how the product was brought to market. “Temporary tracheostomies are used in many areas of surgery and anaesthesia for short-term respiratory support,” said Claudia. “Once a patient has been decannulated, or had their tube removed, it is important that the tracheostomy wounds heal as quickly as possible as any delay could prove problematic. We needed a dressing that enhanced healing and also allowed the patient to communicate, but sadly this type of dressing just didn’t exist.” As part of her role Claudia oversees tracheostomies from insertion to removal, wound healing and discharge. It was during her day-to-day routine that she realised that there weren’t any specific dressings available, so like a lot of other clinicians in the country, she used a DIY dressing made from different components combined together.


(From left to right) Mr Malcolm Cameron, consultant maxillofacial surgeon; Claudia Russell, nurse consultant in tracheostomy management; Simon Talbot, managing director P3 Medical; Dr Basil Matta, associate medical director, Addenbrooke’s Hospital; Stuart Thomson, head of medical technology, HEE


Practically this solution worked, however it meant that it was someone’s job after every procedure to put the dressing together each time which took extra time and used items that weren’t actually designed to be used in this way. Working with her colleagues, Mr Malcolm Cameron and Mr Luke Cascarini, both consultant maxillofacial surgeons, the trio designed their very own dressing used


Once a patient has been decannulated, or had their tube removed, it is important that the tracheostomy wounds heal as quickly as possible as any delay


could prove problematic. Claudia Russell, nurse consultant in tracheostomy management.


46 I WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM


specifically for post-removal of the tracheotomy tube.


Armed with concept drawings the clinicians worked with Health Enterprise East (HEE), a regional NHS Innovation Hub, to turn their ideas into a commercial product. “We had no idea where to start or what the process was to turn our dressings into a product that clinicians could use in hospitals,” admitted Claudia. “The HEE were fantastic as they gave us advice on patents and design rights and funded prototyping and proof of concept designs. They also helped to find a suitable licensee and negotiated the licence terms which has allowed for the delivery of the product to market. “The HEE had worked with P3 Medical on a previous project and knew that they specialised in working with clinicians to develop cost-effective solutions which enhance hospital efficiencies and patient


NOVEMBER 2018


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88