API-First
Giving operators control without compromising the core
Comtrade Gaming's Rok Intihar, VP Technology, explains how API-first architecture is enabling operators to integrate new suppliers, develop bespoke frontends and manage increasingly complex technology ecosystems without sacrificing platform stability, security or scalability.
“API-first” has become a widely used term in platform technology. What does a genuinely API-first iGaming platform look like in practice, and how does it differ architecturally from a traditional platform with APIs added around the core?
Comtrade Gaming was originally a software technology solution provider, and our product was made from the knowledge we accumulated working for the gaming industry. But we also worked for enterprises and governments, in a lot of different domains, so we were always oriented toward industry best practices. Different teams were working with different practices, standards and new ideas.
For example, working on government projects like document handling taught us how important auditing is, how different formats interchange, how versioning of documents works, how regulation changing affects the product etc. Tat explains why our product has been built as it was: to layer properly, use interfaces inside the code, component design, separating database etc.
Tat matters because API-first is very hard to add later. If the inside of a platform is one big block, any API in front of it stays a thin wrapper, and the vendor's own tools keep going around it. In iCore, our own back office and player portals use the same APIs we give operators. Modules like tournaments, jackpots and campaigns run as separate services and talk to the core through APIs and events.
Not every part of a platform with this much history is equally modern. Te newer layers follow these principles most fully, and we keep moving older services forward behind stable contracts.
84
One of the promises of API-first architecture is that operators can innovate without rebuilding their underlying platform. Which parts of the technology stack can realistically be changed or replaced independently, and where do dependencies on the core still remain?
Most of what sits around the core. Te front end, engagement modules like tournaments and jackpots, and the providers behind our integration adapters can all change without the core noticing. Systems like a CRM or a data warehouse can subscribe to our events instead of reading our database. What stays in the core is the wallet, player accounts and the regulatory controls. Regulators audit exactly those parts, and in some markets, they're certified down to the file hash, so changing them means going through certification again.
How does an API-first approach change the process of integrating new game suppliers, payment providers, CRM tools, KYC solutions or other third-party technologies? Where are the biggest integration bottlenecks today?
Te integration work itself has become fairly routine for us. We've done more than a hundred casino integrations and about as many on the service side. Each category has its own template, with the standard wallet or payment contract, signature handling, a simulator and tests, so a new game provider is mostly a matter of mapping their API onto ours. Lately we've also used AI to generate the first version of an integration from the provider's documentation, with our engineers checking each step, and that has made the coding part a lot shorter.
Where it still slows down is usually outside the code. Provider
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222
