A private operator can integrate a supplier, game or payment method relatively quickly. For a lottery, the same change can take considerably longer. Te mindset is changing, however. Gabelica increasingly sees lottery becoming part of the broader iGaming conversation rather than existing as an entirely separate industry.
“People are starting to realise this is only one industry,” she says. “Tey’re not two separate industries. It’s one, just with different verticals and different types of operators.”
NO NEED FOR THE ‘BIG BANG’
Convergence also sits behind EveryMatrix’s decision to establish lottery as a dedicated business unit after more than a decade of supplying technology to lottery organisations. Te company is now developing lottery-specific products including draw games, pool betting and eInstants, alongside the platform, payments, player management and other technology already developed across the wider EveryMatrix business.
For Gabelica, bringing technology from iGaming into lottery does not mean telling established operators to discard everything they already have. “Tey don’t need to do the Big Bang if they don’t want to,” she says. Instead, a modular approach allows individual components to be replaced over time, modernising around existing infrastructure before progressively removing legacy technology. “You can replace each component,” she explains. “You can swap them out on the go, and it can take you years to get the lottery up to date.”
Te alternative is potentially self-defeating. A lottery could spend years procuring and implementing an entirely new system, only to discover that technology has moved again by the time it launches. “If you wait to change everything and do the Big Bang, how long will it take you to do it? Two years will pass and then you would again be behind with the technology,” she explains.
Te challenge for suppliers is that lottery moves at its own pace. Selling into the sector is less transactional than conventional B2B iGaming and depends heavily on long-term relationships and trust. “You don’t go to a lottery to sell something,” says Gabelica. “It’s a matter of relationship building and trust. It’s therefore a much longer period than when you engage with a private operator.”
For all the talk of transformation, Gabelica is equally reluctant to portray retail as an obsolete model waiting to disappear. In many markets it remains enormously successful, while elsewhere regulation does not yet permit lotteries to make a substantial digital move. Te future is, therefore, unlikely to be a simple migration from shops to smartphones. Instead, Europe appears set for an increasingly fragmented lottery landscape in which markets move at very different speeds.
What changes is the competitive benchmark. As lottery customers become accustomed to the convenience, personalisation and user experience available elsewhere in their digital lives, putting the existing product online won’t meet those expectations. It’s not so much about whether digital will grow, but what lotteries choose to do with it.
205
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222