search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
854 infection control & hospital epidemiology july 2017, vol. 38, no. 7


table 4. Risk Ratios for Mortality 30 and 90 Days After Culture for Patients With Positive Cultures Relative to Patients Without Positive Cultures, Regardless of Location Status (Hospitalized or Postdischarge)


30 Days 95% CI Organism


MDR Gram-negative bacteria Combined Invasivea


Noninvasiveb


MDR Acinetobacter Combined Invasive


Noninvasive


MDR Pseudomonas Combined Invasive


Noninvasive


MDR Enterobacteriaceae Combined Invasive


MRSA


Noninvasive Combined


HAIc Colonizationd RR


1.42 2.32 1.33


2.21 3.34 1.98


1.70 2.08 1.62


1.18 2.07 1.09


1.55 2.77 1.35


Lower


1.31 1.85 1.22


1.78 1.97 1.53


1.50 1.22 1.42


1.07 1.64 0.99


1.42 2.39 1.22


Upper


1.54 2.92 1.44


2.74 5.66 2.57


1.93 3.56 1.85


1.29 2.60 1.21


1.70 3.21 1.50


P Value


<.0001 <.0001 <.0001


<.0001 <.0001 <.0001


<.0001 .007


<.0001 <.0001


<.0001 .074


<.0001 <.0001 <.0001


RR


1.48 1.93 1.39


1.91 2.39 1.72


1.65 1.99 1.59


1.28 1.88 1.21


1.44 2.24 1.31


Lower


1.39 1.59 1.30


1.61 1.49 1.40


1.51 1.34 1.44


1.20 1.57 1.12


1.34 1.99 1.21


90 Days 95% CI Upper


1.57 2.33 1.48


2.27 3.84 2.12


1.82 2.96 1.75


1.37 2.26 1.30


1.54 2.53 1.42


P Value


<.0001 <.0001 <.0001


<.0001 <.0001 <.0001


<.0001 .001


<.0001 <.0001


<.0001 <.0001


<.0001 <.0001 <.0001


NOTE. MDR, multidrug resistant; RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval; HAI, healthcare-associated infection; MRSA, methicillin-resistant


Staphylococcus aureus. aCulture obtained from a typically sterile site including blood, bone, bone marrow, cerebrospinal fluid, pleural fluid, peritoneal fluid, synovial


fluid, lymph node. bCulture obtained from a site other than those listed for invasive cultures. cUsing algorithm developed by Branch-Elliman et al (2014), culture obtained from sterile site (blood, bone, or device) or patient was treated


with MRSA-active antimicrobials in the 5 days prior to or following the positive culture. dPositive culture not classified as HAI by Branch-Elliman algorithm.


This study has several limitations to. First, our exposure of


interest was a positive clinical culture for 1 of several MDR organisms. While these cultures may not all be indicative of true infections, we identified whether the cultures were obtained from a site that is usually considered sterile (eg, blood, bone, bone marrow, cerebrospinal fluid, pleural fluid, synovial fluid, and lymph node) or unsterile. Positive cultures from sterile sites are much more likely to be infections. Second, our analyses used administrative and clinical data from the VA. These data were not produced for the purposes of research but in the process of providing care to patients in the VA system. Thus, these results may not be generalizable to other settings to the extent that differences exist between patients and healthcare delivery systems. Also, our analyses may include residual confounding related to severity of illness during the index hospitalization, which we were unable to control for using administrative data. Third, for the purposes of this analysis, we focused solely on a patient’s first hospita- lization during our time period of interest. And finally, patients receiving care in the VA system may not be representative of


healthcare overall in the United States. A similar analysis using non-VA data would be useful and may yield more general- izable results. Our study has several strengths. First, this is the largest study


to estimate the attributable mortality associated with HAIs due to MDR gram-negative bacteria with patients from more than 100 hospitals in the United States. Second, we used a propensity-score matching approach to select control patients in which we matched patients based on the length of stay prior to infection. Thus, we avoided introducing time-dependent bias to our estimates that would have occurred in an analysis and did not explicitly take into account the time-varying nature of HAIs.28 By incorporating important postadmission confounders (eg, indicators for surgery, mechanical ventila- tion, peritoneal dialysis, and hemodialysis, and days spent in both the medical and surgical ICU) in our propensity score estimation, our mortality estimates are likely to more accu- rately represent the true mortality effect. Third, unlike other data sources, the VA dataset allowed us to follow patients beyond discharge to ascertain whether they died within 30 or


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136