852 infection control & hospital epidemiology july 2017, vol. 38, no. 7
table 2. Characteristics of Patients With Positive Cultures for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus and Propensity Score-Matched Controls
No Positive MRSA Culture
Total
Culture type HAI
Colonization
Age, y BMI
<18.5
18.5–24.9 25–29.9 30–34.9 35+
Missing
Insurance No insurance Insurance Missing
Gender
Female Male
Missing
Race/Ethnicity White Black Asian
Native American Hispanic
Unknown/Missing
Marital Status Married
Never married Divorced Separated Widowed
Unknown/Missing CCI/Elixhauser
Outpatient cost in 365 d prior to admission
405
12,083 11
8,338 2,688 51 66
774 582
4,508 1,513 3,570 622
1,769 517 1.5
3.2
96.7 0.1
66.7 21.5 0.4 0.5 6.2 4.7
36.1 12.1 28.6 5.0
14.2 4.1 1.9
116
3,353 2
2,356 700 7
24
218 166
1,209 445
1,018 165 463 171 1.5
3.3
96.6 0.1
67.9 20.2 0.2 0.7 6.3 4.8
34.8 12.8 29.3 4.8
13.3 4.9 1.9
$10,427 $14,310 $10,879 $13,566
NOTE. MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; CCI, Charlson comorbidity index.
evaluations of both the costs of the resources required to undertake the interventions and the benefits of prevented mortality and morbidity. Themeasures of attributable mortality that we found improve
upon estimates reported elsewhere in the published literature. For example, we recently published a study that used a simula- tion model parameterized using published data to estim- ate the mortality and cost burden of healthcare-associated MDR Acinetobacter infections. Using estimates from several published studies, we estimated an attributable mortality risk
Positive MRSA Culture
No./Mean %/SD No./Mean %/SD 12,499
… …
67.0 28.2 369
3,643 4,151 2,381 1,603 352
3,119 6,653 2,727
13.9 7.2 3.0
29.1 33.2 19.0 12.8 2.8
25.0 53.2 21.8
3,471 484
2,987 67.3 28.0 134
1,086 1,054 644 417 136
978
1,638 855
13.9 86.1 13.3 7.0 3.9
31.3 30.4 18.6 12.0 3.9
28.2 47.2 24.6
table 3. Incidence of Positive Clinical Cultures by Organism Incidencea
95% CI Organism
MDR Acinetobacter Total
Invasiveb Noninvasivec
MDR Pseudomonas Total
Invasive Noninvasive
MDR Enterobacteriaceae Total
Invasive Noninvasive
MRSA Total HAId
Colonizatione Mean
0.148 0.050 0.097
0.514 0.050 0.463
1.624 0.190 1.419
1.516 0.206 1.310
Lower
0.136 0.043 0.087
0.491 0.043 0.440
1.581 0.176 1.379
1.480 0.193 1.277
Upper
0.161 0.058 0.108
0.539 0.058 0.486
1.668 0.204 1.460
1.552 0.219 1.344
NOTE: CI, confidence interval; MDR, multidrug resistant; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; HAI, healthcare-associated
synovial fluid, lymph node. cCulture obtained from a site other than those listed for invasive
infection. aPer 1,000 patient days at risk bCulture obtained from a typically sterile site including blood, bone, bone marrow, cerebrospinal fluid, pleural fluid, peritoneal fluid,
cultures. dUsing algorithm developed by Branch-Elliman et al (2014), culture obtained from sterile site (blood, bone, or device) or patient was treated with MRSA-active antimicrobials in the 5 days prior to or
following the positive culture. ePositive culture not classified as HAI by Branch-Elliman algorithm.
of 10.6 (95% CI, 2.5%–29.4%).20–22 In addition, a study by Eagye et al19 found that the attributable risk of death in patients with healthcare-associated MDR Pseudomonas infec- tions was 22.2%. However, the data used to generate each of these mortality estimates came from single facilities, and in each case, the analyses did not control for confounders in the relationship between infection and mortality. Our estimates for combined invasive and noninvasive positive cultures were lower than these previous estimates in part because we were able to control for confounders including not only post- hospitalization but also preindex events that can increase the risk of HAI and mortality such as surgery, number of days in the ICU, mechanical ventilation, peritoneal dialysis, and hemodialysis. In addition, our detailed microbiology data allowed us to differentiate between invasive and noninvasive positive cultures. A study by Roberts et al23 reported an attributable mortality
rate of 6.5% using data from a single hospital in Chicago. This estimate was calculated by pooling patients with resistant
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136