search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
infection control & hospital epidemiology july 2017, vol. 38, no. 7 rese arch brie f


Thirty-Day Readmissions After Hospitalization for Clostridium difficile Enteritis Measures and Predictors: A Nationwide Analysis


Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the most common cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea and an emerging cause of enteritis in individuals even without significant risk factors or healthcare exposure.1 CDI frequently requires hospitalizations including 30-day readmissions, contributing to significant healthcare utilization and cost. Limited data are available on demographic characteristics and predictors of readmissions after an index hospitalization for CDI. We determined the national level 30-day readmission measures and predictors after hospitalization for CDI.


methods


For our analyses, we utilized the Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) 2013, an all-payer database that includes 14 million discharges from 21 states representing 49.1% of all US hospitalizations.2 We identified our index admissions as patients with principal diagnosis of CDI enteritis using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code 008.45, which has been shown to have good accuracy.3 The criteria used to identify index admissions and 30- day readmissions were adopted from the definition by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).4 Thus, any admis- sion within 30 days of an index admission was considered a readmission, and any admission for CDI beyond 30 days of index admission was a separate index admission. We excluded (1) patients who died during the index admission because they were not at risk of readmission, (2) patients with index dis- charges in December due to lack of sufficient time to capture their 30-day readmissions, (3) patientswithmissing information on age or gender, and (4) patients who were not residents of the state of index hospitalization because readmissions cannot be tracked across state boundaries in the NRD.5 Manufacturer- provided sampling weights were used to produce national-level estimates. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify predictors for any-cause 30-day readmission while adjusting for patient demographics, insurance, Elixhauser comorbidities, and hospital characteristics.


results


In this study, we included 89,174 index hospitalizations due to CDI enteritis between January and November 2013. Among them, 21,289 (23.9%) had at least 1 readmission within 30 days of index discharge. The total number of 30-day readmissionswas


discussion


Our data indicate that almost one-fourth of patients hospitalized for CDI are readmitted within 30 days. This readmission rate is as high as that for congestive heart failure and even higher than those for pneumonia and myocardial infarction.6 Younger males with CDI with a length of hospital stay >1 week are more likely to be readmitted. The finding that younger age was associated with higher readmissions is interesting. Similar results have been shown in previous studies among patients with heart failure, where higher age was associated with lower risk of readmission.7A systematic review by Jin et al8 demonstrated higher medication compliance in the elderly compared to younger patients. The lower risk of readmission among the elderly could be partly explained by this difference in medication compliance. Strategies directed toward improving appropriate use of correct antibiotics should be implemented to improve quality of care.9 Arranging early follow-up after discharge among susceptible populationmay also reduce CDI readmissions due to recurrence/nonresolution.


acknowledgments


Financial support: No financial support was provided relevant to this article. Potential conflicts of interest: All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.


Abhinav Goyal, MD;1


Kshitij Chatterjee, MD;2 Chitra Punjabi, MD;1


Janani Rangaswami, MD1 Affiliations: 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Einstein Medical Center,


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 2. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.


24,420 (27 readmissions per 100 index admissions). Compared to patients without 30-day readmissions, those with at least 1 readmission had higher prevalence of comorbidities and had a longer length of stay (LOS) during index admission (Supple- mental Table 1). Independent predictors for any-cause 30-day readmissions were younger age (≤40 years, hazard ratio[HR], 1.45; P<.001), male sex (HR, 1.09; P=.001), index LOS>7days (75th percentile of LOS; HR, 1.22; P<.001), nonroutine home discharge (HR, 1.20; P<.001), and Medicare (HR, 1.38; P<.001) orMedicaid (HR, 1.50; P<.001) as primary insurance (compared to private insurance) (Figure 1A). The most common reasons for readmission were CDI (26.2%), septicemia (8.3%), and acute kidney injury (2.3%) (data not shown). The median time to readmission was 15 days, and proportion of readmissions showed a slow downward trend with time from index discharge (Figure 1B). The mean costs of an index hospitalization and a readmission were $9,843 and $13,241, respectively.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136