search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
806 infection control & hospital epidemiology july 2017, vol. 38, no. 7


figure 4. Dendogram for environmental and case-patient isolates collected during a Pseudomonas aeruginosa outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit. Dendogram displays the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns obtained from select environmental and case- patient isolates. Groupings identified by related PFGE patterns are labeled at the right side of figure.


dence that POU filters interrupted this P. aeruginosa outbreak in the short term, consistent with published literature.28,29 Although a single study determined that POU filters are the most economical means of protecting vulnerable hospital patients from waterborne pathogens,30 others caution against


Continuous education of healthcare personnel, auditing, and feedback about adherence to hand-hygiene policies were recommended. Staff hands could have also been indirectly contaminated with P. aeruginosa through touching sink basins or nearby shelves. Although colonized staff have been implicated in transmission of P. aeruginosa in previous out- breaks,7,26,27 we did not find an association between specific staff members and cases. Our epidemic curve and case-control study provide evi-


Environmental Protection Agency standards for safe drinking water32) and no Pseudomonas. Cultures of postfilter water should be negative. During the following months, the hospital followed these recommendations and continued additional water remedia- tion efforts, including decontamination of faucets and drains, routine flushing of faucets, hot water flushing of the hospital water system, hyperchlorination, monitoring temperature and water flow variability, and continuous supplemental chlorine dioxide. Despite remediation, prefiltered water samples continued to grow P. aeruginosa, although levels declined. Postfilter water samples were negative. From January to November 2015, 8 new cases of


their use as a long-term solution.31 We recommended POU filtration continue until P. aeruginosa is no longer detected in the hospital water. We recommended validation of remedia- tion measures through monthly microbiologic testing of prefiltered water and validation of the POU filters by testing postfilter water monthly before the scheduled replacement of the filter. The goal of remediation was total heterotrophic plate counts ≤500 CFU/mL (in accordance with


P. aeruginosa occurred in NICU patients, representing an increase over baseline, with 1 death. The hospital continued to work closely with the state health department during this time; CDCwas periodically consulted. In response to these cases, the hospital hired outside experts to direct water remediation. We continued to recommend regular testing of postfilter water to ensure proper filter function and strict adherence to infection control measures until eradication of P. aeruginosa could be maintained. The reasons for continued cases was unknown,


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136