search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
infection control & hospital epidemiology july 2017, vol. 38, no. 7 original article


Appropriateness of Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Pediatric Patients in Italy


Mariavalentina Giordano, MD; Lorena Squillace, MD; Maria Pavia, MD, MPH


objectives. Appropriate use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) reduces intraoperative wound contamination in pediatric surgery, thus minimizing the risk of surgical site infection (SSIs). Conversely, inappropriate use of SAP exposes patients to the risk of antibiotic side effects and contributes to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Our aims were to describe SAP administration and to analyze factors associated with nonadherence in pediatric patients.


design. Descriptive study. setting. Overall, 955 pediatric patients underwent 1,038 surgical procedures.


methods. We assessed adherence to SAP international guidelines for surgical procedures performed on children aged <18 years in 2015 in 4 randomly selected hospitals in Calabria (Italy). The clinical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed.


results. Appropriate SAP administration or nonadministration pertained to 754 surgical procedures (72.6%). Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis was administered in 88.5% of 358 procedures with an SAP indication. Adherence to guidelines for appropriate drug choice were followed in 5.7% of cases, for route of administration in 76.7%of cases, for timing in 48.6%of cases, for duration in 14.5%of cases, and for dose in 91.5%of cases, and for all components in only 5 cases (1.6%). Among 680 procedures without SAP indication, 35.7% case patients received antibiotics. Inappropriate administration of antibiotics in procedures without SAP indication was associated with surgical specialty wards (P=.008), ordinary admission (P<.001), head and neck surgical procedures (P=.020), clean surgery (P=.017), and surgical duration (P=.010).


conclusions. Discrepancies between SAP guidelines and actual practice behavior more frequently indicate excessive use of antibiotics than underuse. Increased awareness of SAP guidelines is required.


Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:823–831


Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common but potentially avoidable complications of adult and pediatric surgery; they contribute significantly to postoperative morbidity and mortality.1 The incidence of SSIs in pediatric populations ranges from 2.5% to 20%.2 Several measures have proven effective in preventing SSIs, including the use of aseptic condi- tions and techniques in the operating room, appropriate patient preparation, and the use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) before and during surgery.3 Indeed, appropriate use of SAP reduces intraoperative wound contamination and mini- mizes the risk of SSIs of procedures for which it is indicated. Conversely, inappropriate use of SAP when it is indicated and administration of antibiotics when they are not indicated are potentially harmful practices; they expose patients to the risk of antibiotic side effects and complications, such as Clostridium difficile infection (a cause of antibiotic-associated colitis) and contribute to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance.4,5 Guidelines for SAP in adult patients are well defined, even if numerous studies have shown that overall adherence to


recommendations is hard to achieve.6–12 Conversely, the use of SAP for pediatric patients is inadequately characterized, although SAP guidelines with recommendations are available regarding appropriate drug choice, timing, route, dose, and duration.13,14 The few reports on SAP in pediatric patients have demonstrated that nonoptimal adherence is related to overuse in surgical interventions where there is no indication for prophylaxis or underuse of SAP when indicated, inappropriate use of third-generation cephalosporins, and administration of SAP for longer than 24 hours.15–17 The aims of this study were to describe SAP administration


and to analyze factors associated with nonadherence in pediatric patients.


methods


The study cohort included patients with the following characteristics: younger than 18, admitted between January 1 and December 31, 2015, to any of 4 randomly selected


Affiliation: Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro “Magna Græcia,” Catanzaro Italy.


© 2017 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 0899-823X/2017/3807-0009. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2017.79 Received December 13, 2016; accepted March 27, 2017; electronically published June 5, 2017


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136