search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
infection control & hospital epidemiology july 2017, vol. 38, no. 7 original article


Attributable Mortality of Healthcare-Associated Infections Due to Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus


Richard E. Nelson, PhD;1,2 Rachel B. Slayton, PhD;3 Vanessa W. Stevens, PhD;1,2 Makoto M. Jones, MD;1,2 Karim Khader, PhD;1,2 Michael A. Rubin, MD, PhD;1,2 John A. Jernigan, MD;3 Matthew H. Samore, MD1,2


objective. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria and methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) on mortality following infection, regardless of patient location.


methods. Weconducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with an inpatient admission in the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) system between October 1, 2007, and November 30, 2010. We constructed multivariate log-binomial regressions to assess the impact of a positive culture on mortality in the 30- and 90-day periods following the first positive culture, using a propensity-score–matched subsample.


results. Patients identified with positive cultures due toMDRAcinetobacter (n=218),MDRPseudomonas aeruginosa (n=1,026), andMDR Enterobacteriaceae (n=3,498) were propensity-score matched to 14,591 patients without positive cultures due to these organisms. In addition, 3,471 patients with positive cultures due to MRSA were propensity-score matched to 12,499 patients without positive MRSA cultures. Multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria were associated with a significantly elevated risk of mortality both for invasive (RR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.85–2.92) and noninvasive cultures (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.22–1.44) during the 30-day period. Similarly, patients with MRSA HAIs (RR, 2.77; 95% CI, 2.39–3.21) and colonizations (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.22–1.50) had an increased risk of death at 30 days.


conclusions. We found that HAIs due to gram-negative bacteria and MRSA conferred significantly elevated 30- and 90-day risks of mortality. This finding held true both for invasive cultures, which are likely to be true infections, and noninvasive infections, which are possibly colonizations.


Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:848–856


Each year an estimated 720,000 healthcare-associated infec- tions (HAIs) or more occur in US acute-care hospitals.1 More than 30% of HAIs are caused by gram-negative bacteria.2 In addition, gram-negative bacteria are the most common source of nosocomial urinary tract infections and pneumonia.3 Infections with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a gram-positive bacterium, are also a source of sub- stantial morbidity and mortality in the United States, and more than 14,000 invasive hospital-onset infections occur annually.4 Infections with these resistant organisms often have limited treatment options. In October 2008, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid


Services (CMS) implemented a policy of not paying for healthcare-associated adverse events determined to have been “reasonably preventable,” including central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs).5 Recent evidence suggests that these efforts have led to a significant decrease in


nosocomial infections of these types.6 To evaluate this and other policies designed to reduce HAIs, it is important to have accurate estimates of the consequences of HAIs, including mortality attributable to the infection. Several existing studies have identified an increased risk of mortality associated with nosocomial infections due to gram-negative bacteria, including a high crude mortality rate for Acinetobacter baumanii ranging from 15% to 55%.7–11 However, these studies have been limited to patients from just 1 or 2 hospitals. The purpose of this study was to estimate the 30- and 90-day mortality risks attributable to HAIs with multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria, specifically Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacteriaceae, and an important gram-positive bacteria, MRSA, relative to a control group of hospitalized patients in more than 100 hospitals in the United States. These estimates are important for estimating the deaths that could be prevented with more aggressive interventions to prevent HAIs. This study adds to the existing


Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah; 3. Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. © 2017 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 0899-823X/2017/3807-0012. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2017.83


Affiliations: 1. Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health System IDEAS Center, Salt Lake City, Utah; 2. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Received November 8, 2016; accepted March 1, 2017; electronically published June 1, 2017


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136