KEY POINTS FOR CONSIDERATION n Set clear aims at each stage of the rehabilitation process n Patient education to enhance patient adherence with respect to the aims n Use a SWOT analysis to assist in achieving patient adherence/compliance n Understand the concepts of rehabilitation and tissue healing n Control tissue loading during the vulnerable subacute stage n Avoidance of a perpetuating chronic inflammatory cycle n Use of outcome measurement and photographs
controlled by a heart monitor with computerised download facility. Lower limb progressive resistance training adopted CKC exercises (squats, leg- press, step-ups), performed within a knee-angle specific to cycling (100º–170º), extending explosively on concentric contraction. Eccentric contractions are not cycling specific, and can result in greater muscle hypertrophy which should be avoided in cyclists (50).
PHASE V: PRE-DISCHARGE AND PERFORMANCE TESTING PHASE The pre-discharge phase is when the therapist makes the decision that the athlete is ‘fit to return to unrestricted activities’ and competition (13). Unlike previous stages, the pre-discharge stage is designed to provoke and expose any physiological or psychological deficiencies. The athlete is subjected to unrestricted maximal physical demands, including functional performance testing, performed over 2-3 consecutive days to enable a realistic assessment.
Ideally the athlete is assessed
each day for clinical symptoms related to any adverse reactions. Failure to meet the criteria would result in the athlete being regressed. Functional performance testing should include all sports-specific activities associated with training and competition. Resulting data should be compared against pre-injury bench-mark performance data, thus allowing direct objective comparisons. In this case study pre- injury data was not available, therefore it was agreed that performance testing would not be undertaken.
CONCLUSION
Rehabilitation of cyclists and athletes alike can be enhanced by applying
16
sound scientific principles embraced within an individualised sports-specific programme. Particular consideration should be given to activity-specific needs which can be formulated in conjuction with the athlete. Progression should be guided by functional deficits, evaluation-based criteria, and most crucially the rate of tissue-healing. Rehabilitation can be further enhanced by patient education, goal-setting, motivational and adherence strategies, all assisted by the use of a simple SWOT analysis.
Patient education and relevant
control mechanisms become more fundamental when the patient is not under continual supervision, as in this particular case study. As clearly established here, early application of PRICE in the management of acute soft tissue injury should be recognised as a crucial component in reducing recovery times.
References: 1. Dettori NJ, Norvell DC. Non-traumatic bicycle injuries: a review of the literature. Sports Medicine 2006;36:7-18 2. Asplund MD, St Pierre P. Knee pain and bicycling. The Physician and Sportsmedicine 2004;32(4):23-30 3. Burke ER. Serious cycling. 2nd edition. Human Kinetics 2002. ISBN 073604129 4. Callaghan MJ. Lower body problems and injury in cycling. Journal of Bodyworks and Movement Therapies 2005; 9;226-236 5. Great Britain Cycling Team: Excellence Department. National Cycling Centre. Manchester 2008 6. Evans P. The healing process at cellular level: a review. Physiotherapy 1980;66(8): 256-259 7. Kannus P, Parkkari TL, Jarvinen T et al. Basic science and clinical studies coincide: active treatment approach is needed after a sports injury. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports 2003;13:150-154 8. Jarvinen MJ, Lehto MU. The effects of early mobilisation and immobilisation on the healing process following muscle injuries.
Sports Medicine Journal 1993;15(2):78- 89 9. Watson T. Tissue repair: the current state of art. sportEX health 2006;19:8-12 10. Clark N. Principles of injury rehabilitation. sportEX medicine 2004;19:6-10 11. Glasgow P. Sports rehabilitation: principles and practice. sportEX medicine 2007;32:10-16 12. Bandy WD. Functional rehabilitation of the athlete. Orthopaedic Physical Therapy Clinics of North America 1992;1:269-281 13. Smith GN. Return to fitness. In: Orthopaedic Physiotherapy - Ed Marian Tidswell. Mosby 1998. ISBN: 0723425922 14. Crossman J. Psychological rehabilitation from sports injuries. Sports Medicine 1997; 23(5):333-339 15. Kisner C, Colby LA. Therapeutic exercise. Foundations and techniques. 4th edition. FA Davis Company 2002. ISBN 080360968X 16. Ward S. Enhancing motivation for rehabilitation adherence. sportEX dynamics 2006;7:6-8 17. Watson T. Soft tissue healing. In Touch 2003;104:2-9 18. Kannus P. (2000). Immobilisation or early mobilisation after an acute soft tissue injury. The Physician and Sports Medicine 2000;28(3):55-63 19. Jarvinen TAH, Jarvinen TLN, Kaariainen M, Kalimo H, Jarvinen M. Muscle injuries: Biology and treatment. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2005;33(5):745- 764 20. ACPSM. Guidelines for the management of soft tissue injury with protection, rest, ice, compression and elevation (PRICE) during the first 72 hours. The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy 1999 21. Hopkins JT, Ingersoll CD. Arthrogenic muscle inhibition: a limiting factor in joint rehabilitation. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 2000;9:135-159 22. Lederman E. The science and practice of manual therapy. 2nd edition. Churchill Livingstone 2005. ISBN 0443074321 23. Airaksinen O. Changes in posttraumatic ankle joint mobility, pain, and edema following intermittent pneumatic compression therapy. Archives Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1989;70:341- 344 24. Airaksinen O. Partanen K, Kolari PJ et al. Intermittent pneumatic compression therapy in post traumatic lower limb edema: computed tomography and clinical measurements. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1991; 72(9):667-670 25. Holey E, Cook E. Evidence-based therapeutic massage: A practical guide for therapists. 2nd edition. Churchill Livingstone 2003. ISBN 0443072302 26. Cameron MH. Physical agents in rehabilitation: from research to practice. 2nd edition. Elsevier Science 2003. ISBN 0721693784 27. Warden SJ, Avin KG, Beck ER et al. Low- intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates and a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug delays knee ligament healing. American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine
sportEX dynamics 2008;17(Jul):11-17