CASH ACCESS STRATEGY
GE and only offer non-branded, off-the-shelf POS terminals, which don’t facilitate the unique requirements of a CA transaction. VARs who established an early footprint in some markets – namely North America – simply stopped innovating or failed to execute.
Kurt Sullivan, Chief Operating Officer of
Passport Technology, a highly advanced VAR in the CA space, states, “I’ve been in gaming and payments for over forty years and never has it been more important for CA and GE partners to collaborate and trust one another as we co- develop ‘smart’ solutions which touch almost every aspect of their cash, treasury and patron operations. It’s what we are focused on and a real point of difference.”
GEs still deploying CA
services through a standard bank POS device can be assured the missed opportunities— cash to the gaming floor—are endless. For example, the bank must apply a Merchant Category Code (MCC) to the transaction type, providing the card issuer critical information associated with the MCC during the authorization request. An “MCC 7995” transaction, which 99% of all bank-provided POS devices carry, indicates a card-present purchase of chips at a land-based GE or an online gaming transaction. The
challenge is that the card issuer does not have enough information based on this broad MCC, and this historically results in a significantly higher percentage of declines and referrals versus the more CA- specific MCCs that VARs employ.
You may ask, “Why is this significant?” When
a patron’s transaction is declined at a GE, they generally attempt lower transaction amounts to gain an approval, which can set off a vicious cycle. As the authorization requests and declines add up, the card issuer may trigger a velocity check and place a hold or block on the patron’s bankcard. With the patron’s urgency building and frustration peaking, it’s likely the patron or GE employee will be stuck on the telephone attempting contact with the card issuer to address the issue.
If the authorization attempt results in a 28 JANUARY 2017
issuers will velocity check, flag, or outright block authorization requests if there is a report of fraudulent activity within a specific geography or within an industry and specifically in markets where payment security technology like EMV (Chip and PIN) has not been deployed; e.g., the US. All of these known and unknown influences impact bankcard authorizations, and the use of MCC 7995, as a card-present, face-to-face transaction in a GE is the worst possible start.
All of this confusion and frustration
contradicts the overriding mandate of the GE to provide patrons with a unique, enjoyable, and memorable experience. Increased lines at the cashier and POIs, frustrated patrons, abnormal CA decline rates, and less cash on the gaming floor will all be minimized as the CA industry adopts, develops, and embraces the
referral, the card issuer is instructing the GE to have the cardholder contact the card issuer to provide required information. Approximately 60% of referrals result in an approval if the cardholder makes contact. It is important to note that most referrals are higher average transaction amounts (generally 80–120% higher than the average non-referred transaction), and a process should be available to facilitate the approval of referred transactions.
Further complexities arise as patrons visiting a GE are often on vacation, away from home and using their bankcards more frequently and for different purposes, which triggers additional card issuer velocity checks. Card
importance of calibrating the CA machine at every turn – starting with the MCC.
The CA vertical settles more than $30 billion
in annual bankcard volume, generating billions in annual payments revenue and impacting the gaming experience of millions of patrons. Operators should expect much more innovation, reliability, and diligence from their CA providers, whether banks or VARs. Passport Technology and a few other providers have stepped up in developing proprietary software designed to increase cash to the floor, improve the patron’s experience, manage responsible gambling, and provide the operator with tools to calibrate their CA systems in real time. Features to consider:
• Dynamic messaging throughout the transaction flow • Authorization attempt limits (number and amounts) • Smart routing to preferred transaction type and fees through POI (brick-and-mortar and online and pre-paid debit) • Real-time fixed and variable fee changes • CA available funds messaging flow (“helping patrons fish for approval”) • Real-time dispense and bill break decisioning • VIP alerts on valued customers and problem- gambling specific patrons • Real-time settlement and corporate / location
pre-fund reporting • Reporting and settlement by employee, position, shift, event, gaming day, or calendar day
• AML reporting and alerts
The notion that a GE should simply match the CA fees or technology from the competitor down the street is not an acceptable approach in 2017. Although you can’t see it, the dynamics at play when a patron is seeking to access cash and presented with a fee for the transaction and rationalizing to “accept” or “decline” is compelling. Whether a resort property or a local casino, the basic concept rings true throughout the world.
You can read part two of this article in our February issue.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110
