search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
As anthropogenic climate change continues seemingly unabated, research continues into the impact of our warming climate on a variety of habitats. IET Editor Rachael Simpson recently spoke to


Carolina Voigt, lead author of the paper “Warming of subarctic tundra increases emissions of all three important greenhouse gases - carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide”, about her work monitoring greenhouse emissions on the Russian tundra, and the interesting results she has seen.


1. So Carolina, could you give us a bit on your background – your qualifi cations, where your interest on this subject stems from for example.


Rachael Simpson


I am a PhD student and I’m writing my doctoral thesis at the moment at the University of Eastern Finland with the Biogeochemistry research group. I did my masters in Germany on a similar topic, studying greenhouse


gas cycling from peatlands which is where I became interested in this topic. I then applied for a PhD position here in Finland, with the opportunity of studying greenhouse gas fl uxes from permafrost soils in the Arctic. I’ve been here in Finland for the past 5 years.


2. You mention similar research you’d undertaken in Germany – was this study in the Arctic a follow-on from your previous work?


Fluxes of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide from Arctic soils is generally a topic that interests me, and in particular the fi eldwork connected to it. Taking measurements during Arctic fi eld expeditions and living in remote conditions with an international research team for several months in a row – that’s what interested me in the fi rst place. And then of course in terms of the topic itself, there is huge potential for new fi ndings and some very interesting subjects for a PhD thesis work in this fi eld.


3. Can you give an explanation of the methods, research techniques and equipment used in this study?


What we are using is a quite basic method called the chamber method that is used to measure fl uxes of greenhouse gases produced (or consumed) in the soil. We just place a chamber, any kind of chamber from simple to very sophisticated, on pre-installed collars in the soil and then leave the chamber in place for a certain period of time. Within this time frame there is an accumulation of gases within the chamber headspace


IET March / April 2017 www.envirotech-online.com


Source: University of Eastern Finland “


Taking measurements during Arctic fi eld expeditions and living in remote conditions with an international research team for several months in a row –


that’s what interested me in the fi rst place.





and that is what we actually measure. From that concentration change in the chamber headspace we can calculate the fl ux of greenhouse gases that are emitted or taken up by the soil and vegetation.


We also have a warming experiment going on alongside, where we are measuring fl uxes from control surfaces next to surfaces that are artifi cially warmed. We use Plexiglass chambers (so-called open-top chambers, OTCs) which are open on top so they don’t limit air exchange much but are still warming the soil surface and the air close to it by a few degrees, which is what is predicted for the near future in climate change scenarios.


These are the core measurement methods that we are using. Of course, we are also using all kinds of surrounding supportive


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84